Riot Platforms Expands Beyond Bitcoin Mining With AMD AI Data Center Deal

January 23, 2026

Riot Platforms (NasdaqCM:RIOT) has signed a 10-year agreement with AMD to lease 25 megawatts of data center capacity.
The deal marks a move beyond Bitcoin mining into AI and high performance computing data centers.
The agreement is described as a material shift in Riot's long-term business model, with scope for further lease expansions.

Riot Platforms, trading at $17.08, is best known for its Bitcoin mining operations. The share price history shows investors have already seen large swings over multi-year periods, including a very large 3-year return and a 14.3% decline over 5 years. More recently, the stock is up 3.1% over the past week, 24.9% over the past month, and 20.6% year to date, with a 31.5% return over the past year.

The new AMD deal introduces a different type of earnings exposure for Riot, tying part of its future to demand for AI and high performance computing capacity rather than only Bitcoin prices and mining economics. For investors, this shift adds another lens for evaluating NasdaqCM:RIOT, including how effectively the company can build, lease, and operate data centers alongside its existing mining footprint.

Stay updated on the most important news stories for Riot Platforms by adding it to your watchlist or portfolio. Alternatively, explore our Community to discover new perspectives on Riot Platforms.

Why Riot Platforms could be great value

Quick Assessment

✅ Price vs Analyst Target: At US$17.08, the price sits below the US$26.47 consensus target, leaving a gap of roughly US$9.39.
❌ Simply Wall St Valuation: The DCF based view is unknown right now, so you do not have a clear under or overvaluation signal from that model.
✅ Recent Momentum: The 30 day return of about 24.9% indicates strong short term momentum as the AMD data center narrative develops.

Check out Simply Wall St's in depth valuation analysis for Riot Platforms.

Key Considerations

📊 The AMD deal introduces additional exposure to AI and high performance computing, so the company is no longer focused solely on Bitcoin mining economics.
📊 Monitor how much data center capacity Riot secures beyond the initial 25 megawatts, as well as the pricing and utilization achieved on those leases.
⚠️ Forecast earnings are expected to decline sharply over the next 3 years, so execution on this new line of business involves meaningful risk.

Dig Deeper

For a more complete view, including additional risks and potential rewards, see the complete Riot Platforms analysis.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

mitchell_lawler

A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

128

zoe_vi5fn1d

Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.

connor_iwn1g1d

Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.