Stock Analysis

Neosem's (KOSDAQ:253590) Solid Earnings May Rest On Weak Foundations

Published
KOSDAQ:A253590

Neosem Inc.'s (KOSDAQ:253590) healthy profit numbers didn't contain any surprises for investors. We believe that shareholders have noticed some concerning factors beyond the statutory profit numbers.

Check out our latest analysis for Neosem

KOSDAQ:A253590 Earnings and Revenue History November 26th 2024

One essential aspect of assessing earnings quality is to look at how much a company is diluting shareholders. As it happens, Neosem issued 7.9% more new shares over the last year. Therefore, each share now receives a smaller portion of profit. Per share metrics like EPS help us understand how much actual shareholders are benefitting from the company's profits, while the net income level gives us a better view of the company's absolute size. You can see a chart of Neosem's EPS by clicking here.

A Look At The Impact Of Neosem's Dilution On Its Earnings Per Share (EPS)

Neosem was losing money three years ago. The good news is that profit was up 20% in the last twelve months. But EPS was less impressive, up only 6.1% in that time. So you can see that the dilution has had a bit of an impact on shareholders.

In the long term, earnings per share growth should beget share price growth. So it will certainly be a positive for shareholders if Neosem can grow EPS persistently. But on the other hand, we'd be far less excited to learn profit (but not EPS) was improving. For that reason, you could say that EPS is more important that net income in the long run, assuming the goal is to assess whether a company's share price might grow.

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

Our Take On Neosem's Profit Performance

Neosem shareholders should keep in mind how many new shares it is issuing, because, dilution clearly has the power to severely impact shareholder returns. Therefore, it seems possible to us that Neosem's true underlying earnings power is actually less than its statutory profit. But at least holders can take some solace from the 6.1% EPS growth in the last year. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. If you want to do dive deeper into Neosem, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. Every company has risks, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Neosem (of which 1 is a bit unpleasant!) you should know about.

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Neosem's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Neosem might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.