- Australia
- /
- Metals and Mining
- /
- ASX:EVN
Evolution Mining Non-Executive Chairman Jacob Klein Sells 30% Of Holding
Some Evolution Mining Limited (ASX:EVN) shareholders may be a little concerned to see that the Non-Executive Chairman, Jacob Klein, recently sold a substantial AU$51m worth of stock at a price of AU$15.76 per share. That sale reduced their total holding by 30% which is hardly insignificant, but far from the worst we've seen.
Evolution Mining Insider Transactions Over The Last Year
In fact, the recent sale by Jacob Klein was the biggest sale of Evolution Mining shares made by an insider individual in the last twelve months, according to our records. So what is clear is that an insider saw fit to sell at around the current price of AU$14.59. While we don't usually like to see insider selling, it's more concerning if the sales take place at a lower price. In this case, the big sale took place at around the current price, so it's not too bad (but it's still not a positive).
Jacob Klein divested 7.85m shares over the last 12 months at an average price of AU$11.18. You can see a visual depiction of insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last 12 months, below. By clicking on the graph below, you can see the precise details of each insider transaction!
View our latest analysis for Evolution Mining
If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of small cap stocks that are not only being bought by insiders but also have attractive valuations.
Insider Ownership
Another way to test the alignment between the leaders of a company and other shareholders is to look at how many shares they own. We usually like to see fairly high levels of insider ownership. Evolution Mining insiders own about AU$226m worth of shares (which is 0.8% of the company). I like to see this level of insider ownership, because it increases the chances that management are thinking about the best interests of shareholders.
So What Do The Evolution Mining Insider Transactions Indicate?
An insider hasn't bought Evolution Mining stock in the last three months, but there was some selling. And there weren't any purchases to give us comfort, over the last year. On the plus side, Evolution Mining makes money, and is growing profits. While insiders do own a lot of shares in the company (which is good), our analysis of their transactions doesn't make us feel confident about the company. In addition to knowing about insider transactions going on, it's beneficial to identify the risks facing Evolution Mining. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Evolution Mining you should be aware of.
Of course Evolution Mining may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of high quality companies.
For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests.
Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.
Discover if Evolution Mining might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.
Access Free AnalysisHave feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.
Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.
Andrew LeggetGreat earnings season, but are the earnings real?

About ASX:EVN
Evolution Mining
Engages in the exploration, mine development and operation, and sale of gold and gold-copper concentrates in Australia and Canada.
Solid track record with adequate balance sheet.