ASOS (LON:ASC) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital. So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, ASOS Plc (LON:ASC) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

Advertisement

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

Check out our latest analysis for ASOS

How Much Debt Does ASOS Carry?

As you can see below, at the end of August 2019, ASOS had UK£90.5m of debt, up from none a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it also had UK£22.1m in cash, and so its net debt is UK£68.4m.

AIM:ASC Historical Debt, February 2nd 2020
AIM:ASC Historical Debt, February 2nd 2020

How Healthy Is ASOS's Balance Sheet?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that ASOS had liabilities of UK£772.2m falling due within a year, and liabilities of UK£19.7m due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had UK£22.1m in cash and UK£53.8m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total UK£716.0m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since ASOS has a market capitalization of UK£2.57b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

ASOS's net debt is only 1.1 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 17.6 times the size. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. It is just as well that ASOS's load is not too heavy, because its EBIT was down 66% over the last year. When it comes to paying off debt, falling earnings are no more useful than sugary sodas are for your health. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if ASOS can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, ASOS saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

Our View

On the face of it, ASOS's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow left us tentative about the stock, and its EBIT growth rate was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least it's pretty decent at covering its interest expense with its EBIT; that's encouraging. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making ASOS stock a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for ASOS you should be aware of, and 1 of them is significant.

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

mitchell_lawler

People are still arguing about whether Nvidia's chips are the fastest. What if Jensen just built a moat that has nothing to do with the chips?

1114
PowerLaw

I wonder why Jensen is doing this. It just increases the risks of failure multifold.

zoe_vi5fn

The bearishness in threads like this is itself worth examining. Every large financing innovation has been called a bubble structure at inception, including securitisation of aircraft, of shipping, of fibre and of mortgages, and three of those four turned out to be genuinely useful market infrastructure that lowered the cost of capital for real assets. The failure case gets remembered because it was spectacular.

About LSE:ASC

ASOS

Operates as an online fashion retailer in the United Kingdom, the European Union, the United States, and internationally.

Fair value with imperfect balance sheet.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

RI
Rick_Orford
FJET logo
Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

Fair Value:US$519.8% undervalued
22 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative
FU
FundamentalFlow
VRT logo
FundamentalFlow on Vertiv Holdings Co ·

The Short and Long Term Compounder of Liquid Cooling industry.

Fair Value:US$45036.2% undervalued
47 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
13 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
SPXC logo
John_Eric on SPX Technologies ·

I Fell in Love With a Data-Center Cooling Stock. Then I Opened the Filings.

Fair Value:US$2034.5% overvalued
20 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
GQG logo
tripledub on GQG Partners ·

The Cheap Genius Problem

Fair Value:AU$3.2155.5% undervalued
30 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
21 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

RO
RockeTeller
DSV logo
RockeTeller on Discovery Mining ·

#1 Silver Play with Positive Cashflow Gold Miner (Top Notch Team)

Fair Value:CA$7084.1% undervalued
61 users have followed this narrative
16 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
ZO
NDAQ logo
zonedinout on Nasdaq ·

Nasdaq revenue will grow by 7.17% while profit margin surges to 35%

Fair Value:US$104.196.3% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
MR
MRT23
FISV logo
MRT23 on Fiserv ·

Q1 2026 FCF collapse has reset the debate from "fair value" to "distressed transformation"

Fair Value:US$5011.0% overvalued
5 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28019.5% undervalued
307 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9118.3% overvalued
165 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0944.2% undervalued
185 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative