Guess? (NYSE:GES) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Guess?, Inc. (NYSE:GES) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

Advertisement

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

See our latest analysis for Guess?

How Much Debt Does Guess? Carry?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of November 2024 Guess? had US$611.0m of debt, an increase on US$537.3m, over one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$140.9m, its net debt is less, at about US$470.1m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:GES Debt to Equity History February 26th 2025

How Strong Is Guess?'s Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Guess? had liabilities of US$848.8m due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.46b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$140.9m and US$383.4m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.78b.

The deficiency here weighs heavily on the US$611.3m company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. After all, Guess? would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

We'd say that Guess?'s moderate net debt to EBITDA ratio ( being 1.6), indicates prudence when it comes to debt. And its strong interest cover of 14.3 times, makes us even more comfortable. On the other hand, Guess? saw its EBIT drop by 5.3% in the last twelve months. That sort of decline, if sustained, will obviously make debt harder to handle. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Guess? can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Guess? recorded free cash flow of 45% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

Our View

We'd go so far as to say Guess?'s level of total liabilities was disappointing. But at least it's pretty decent at covering its interest expense with its EBIT; that's encouraging. Looking at the bigger picture, it seems clear to us that Guess?'s use of debt is creating risks for the company. If all goes well, that should boost returns, but on the flip side, the risk of permanent capital loss is elevated by the debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Be aware that Guess? is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About NYSE:GES

Guess?

Designs, markets, distributes, and licenses lifestyle collections of apparel and accessories for men, women, and children.

Average dividend payer with mediocre balance sheet.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

TA
Talos
TSLA logo
Talos on Tesla ·

The "Physical AI" Monopoly – A New Industrial Revolution

Fair Value:US$665.3637.3% undervalued
29 users have followed this narrative
14 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative
MA
CSG logo
Marek_Trnka on CSG ·

Czechoslovak Group - is it really so hot?

Fair Value:€5548.6% undervalued
36 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
13 users have liked this narrative
AL
alex30free
SECARE logo
alex30free on Swedencare ·

The Compound Effect: From Acquisition to Integration

Fair Value:SEK 46.2846.8% undervalued
10 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
1 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

AL
alex30free
VIT B logo
alex30free on Vitec Software Group ·

Swedens Constellation Software

Fair Value:SEK 316.8923.3% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnimalDoctorKwon
NOTV logo
AnimalDoctorKwon on Inotiv ·

Inotiv NAMs Test Center

Fair Value:US$1.275.8% undervalued
3 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
RE
PROX logo
RecMag on Proximus ·

Proximus: The State-Backed Backup Plan with 7% Gross Yield and 15% Currency Upside.

Fair Value:€2566.5% undervalued
37 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

DA
davidlsander
UBI logo
davidlsander on Ubisoft Entertainment ·

Is Ubisoft the Market’s Biggest Pricing Error? Why Forensic Value Points to €33 Per Share

Fair Value:€33.886.3% undervalued
57 users have followed this narrative
5 users have commented on this narrative
25 users have liked this narrative
OO
NEO logo
OOO97 on Neo Performance Materials ·

Undervalued Key Player in Magnets/Rare Earth

Fair Value:CA$25.3319.7% undervalued
79 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
20 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
NVDA logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

Fair Value:US$253.0226.1% undervalued
1068 users have followed this narrative
6 users have commented on this narrative
32 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

Advertisement