RumbleOn (NASDAQ:RMBL) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that RumbleOn, Inc. (NASDAQ:RMBL) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality.

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

What Is RumbleOn's Net Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that RumbleOn had US$461.0m of debt in December 2024, down from US$565.6m, one year before. However, it does have US$85.3m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$375.7m.

A Look At RumbleOn's Liabilities

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that RumbleOn had liabilities of US$324.4m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$394.1m due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$85.3m in cash and US$30.5m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$602.7m.

This deficit casts a shadow over the US$102.8m company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, RumbleOn would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

See our latest analysis for RumbleOn

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

RumbleOn shareholders face the double whammy of a high net debt to EBITDA ratio (9.7), and fairly weak interest coverage, since EBIT is just 0.38 times the interest expense. This means we'd consider it to have a heavy debt load. One redeeming factor for RumbleOn is that it turned last year's EBIT loss into a gain of US$25m, over the last twelve months. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine RumbleOn's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of the earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) is backed by free cash flow. Over the last year, RumbleOn actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.

Our View

On the face of it, RumbleOn's interest cover left us tentative about the stock, and its level of total liabilities was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least it's pretty decent at converting EBIT to free cash flow; that's encouraging. Overall, it seems to us that RumbleOn's balance sheet is really quite a risk to the business. For this reason we're pretty cautious about the stock, and we think shareholders should keep a close eye on its liquidity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for RumbleOn you should know about.

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.