Is Powernet Technologies (KOSDAQ:037030) Using Too Much Debt?

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that Powernet Technologies Corporation (KOSDAQ:037030) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

Advertisement

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

View our latest analysis for Powernet Technologies

What Is Powernet Technologies's Debt?

As you can see below, Powernet Technologies had ₩23.3b of debt at September 2020, down from ₩30.0b a year prior. However, it does have ₩18.1b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about ₩5.17b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
KOSDAQ:A037030 Debt to Equity History December 24th 2020

A Look At Powernet Technologies's Liabilities

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Powernet Technologies had liabilities of ₩48.3b due within 12 months and liabilities of ₩13.8b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of ₩18.1b as well as receivables valued at ₩27.4b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by ₩16.7b.

Since publicly traded Powernet Technologies shares are worth a total of ₩90.5b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

Looking at its net debt to EBITDA of 0.65 and interest cover of 3.3 times, it seems to us that Powernet Technologies is probably using debt in a pretty reasonable way. But the interest payments are certainly sufficient to have us thinking about how affordable its debt is. Sadly, Powernet Technologies's EBIT actually dropped 6.6% in the last year. If earnings continue on that decline then managing that debt will be difficult like delivering hot soup on a unicycle. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is Powernet Technologies's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Powernet Technologies reported free cash flow worth 7.5% of its EBIT, which is really quite low. That limp level of cash conversion undermines its ability to manage and pay down debt.

Our View

Powernet Technologies's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and interest cover definitely weigh on it, in our esteem. But the good news is it seems to be able handle its debt, based on its EBITDA, with ease. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that Powernet Technologies is taking some risks with its use of debt. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 5 warning signs for Powernet Technologies (of which 1 shouldn't be ignored!) you should know about.

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

If you’re looking to trade Powernet Technologies, open an account with the lowest-cost* platform trusted by professionals, Interactive Brokers. Their clients from over 200 countries and territories trade stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds worldwide from a single integrated account. Promoted


New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
*Interactive Brokers Rated Lowest Cost Broker by StockBrokers.com Annual Online Review 2020


Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

mitchell_lawler

Micron (MU) is booming, and it still doesn't look ‘expensive’ based on next year's earnings. So why does our own valuation say it could be worth 40% less?

2613
zoe_vi5fn

A low price to earnings ratio at the top of the cycle is a warning rather than a bargain, and a terrifyingly high one at the bottom is often the entry point

darius_xnnrd

Memory used to have a dozen participants racing each other into oversupply, and now it has three. High bandwidth memory is qualified into customer designs years ahead, sold under long-term agreements, and is far harder to switch away from than commodity DRAM.

About KOSDAQ:A037030

Powernet Technologies

Manufactures and sells SMPS products.

Mediocre balance sheet with low risk.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

RI
Rick_Orford
FJET logo
Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

Fair Value:US$515.2% undervalued
34 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
FU
FundamentalFlow
VRT logo
FundamentalFlow on Vertiv Holdings Co ·

The Short and Long Term Compounder of Liquid Cooling industry.

Fair Value:US$45034.7% undervalued
65 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
12 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
SPXC logo
John_Eric on SPX Technologies ·

I Fell in Love With a Data-Center Cooling Stock. Then I Opened the Filings.

Fair Value:US$2037.1% overvalued
28 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
GQG logo
tripledub on GQG Partners ·

The Cheap Genius Problem

Fair Value:AU$3.2155.0% undervalued
36 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
24 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

MO
CIRA logo
moataz_5ewrk on Cairo For Investment And Real Estate Developments-CIRA Education ·

Deep Value Opportunity

Fair Value:ج.م43.5711.7% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
SE
Sertan1978
IBM logo
Sertan1978 on International Business Machines ·

Why I See IBM as a Long-Term Enterprise AI and Hybrid Cloud Play

Fair Value:US$166.7340.5% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AN
andrei9868
VST logo
andrei9868 on Vistra ·

Vistra Energy ($VST): The Flexible Power Platform Capturing AI Load Growth

Fair Value:US$22534.2% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28019.6% undervalued
315 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9118.0% overvalued
172 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0944.7% undervalued
192 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative