Stock Analysis

Here's Why Kmw (KOSDAQ:032500) Can Afford Some Debt

KOSDAQ:A032500
Source: Shutterstock

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Kmw Inc. (KOSDAQ:032500) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

Advertisement

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

How Much Debt Does Kmw Carry?

As you can see below, at the end of March 2025, Kmw had ₩72.9b of debt, up from ₩52.7b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it also had ₩50.4b in cash, and so its net debt is ₩22.5b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
KOSDAQ:A032500 Debt to Equity History July 5th 2025

How Healthy Is Kmw's Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Kmw had liabilities of ₩114.2b due within a year, and liabilities of ₩7.48b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of ₩50.4b as well as receivables valued at ₩27.7b due within 12 months. So its liabilities total ₩43.6b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

Since publicly traded Kmw shares are worth a total of ₩551.9b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Kmw will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

View our latest analysis for Kmw

In the last year Kmw wasn't profitable at an EBIT level, but managed to grow its revenue by 14%, to ₩94b. That rate of growth is a bit slow for our taste, but it takes all types to make a world.

Caveat Emptor

Over the last twelve months Kmw produced an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss. To be specific the EBIT loss came in at ₩41b. Considering that alongside the liabilities mentioned above does not give us much confidence that company should be using so much debt. Quite frankly we think the balance sheet is far from match-fit, although it could be improved with time. Another cause for caution is that is bled ₩37b in negative free cash flow over the last twelve months. So suffice it to say we consider the stock very risky. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Kmw (including 1 which is concerning) .

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Kmw might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.