These 4 Measures Indicate That Interfactory (TSE:4057) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies Interfactory, Inc. (TSE:4057) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

Advertisement

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

View our latest analysis for Interfactory

What Is Interfactory's Net Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of August 2024 Interfactory had JP¥400.0m of debt, an increase on JP¥300.0m, over one year. However, it does have JP¥355.0m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about JP¥45.0m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
TSE:4057 Debt to Equity History January 14th 2025

A Look At Interfactory's Liabilities

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Interfactory had liabilities of JP¥769.0m falling due within a year, and liabilities of JP¥14.0m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of JP¥355.0m as well as receivables valued at JP¥530.0m due within 12 months. So it actually has JP¥102.0m more liquid assets than total liabilities.

This short term liquidity is a sign that Interfactory could probably pay off its debt with ease, as its balance sheet is far from stretched.

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

Interfactory has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.17. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 11.8 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. Although Interfactory made a loss at the EBIT level, last year, it was also good to see that it generated JP¥59m in EBIT over the last twelve months. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is Interfactory's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it is important to check how much of its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) converts to actual free cash flow. Over the last year, Interfactory saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.

Our View

Interfactory's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was a real negative on this analysis, although the other factors we considered were considerably better. In particular, we are dazzled with its interest cover. When we consider all the elements mentioned above, it seems to us that Interfactory is managing its debt quite well. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example Interfactory has 3 warning signs (and 1 which is significant) we think you should know about.

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

MI
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

Druckenmiller says cheap money's days are numbered. Boring, self-funding companies could be the opportunity.

Druckenmiller says cheap money's days are numbered. Boring, self-funding companies could be the opportunity. cover
1311
DE
devon_jd150

Leverage on its own is close to useless as a screen right now, because so much corporate debt was termed out at 2 to 3% and has not repriced. A business at three times leverage with nothing due until 2031 is in a completely different position from the same ratio rolling next year. Screen on weighted average maturity and the schedule behind it.

LE
LeverageIsLovely

In my view, Insurance companies are best positioned for this.

Mitchell Lawler

Which payment stocks actually get paid?

Which payment stocks actually get paid? cover
Every new payment app was supposed to kill Visa and Mastercard. Instead, they got bigger. So what does that mean for the payment stocks on your radar?
32

About TSE:4057

Interfactory

Engages in the cloud commerce platform business in Japan.

Excellent balance sheet with questionable track record.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

RI
Rick_Orford
FJET logo
Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

Fair Value:US$522.8% undervalued
67 users have followed this narrative
4 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
Recommended Voice
META logo
tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

Fair Value:US$5862.7% undervalued
48 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
34 users have liked this narrative
TA
Talos
Emerging Author
VOYG logo
Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

Fair Value:US$385.291.0% undervalued
32 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
IV
Emerging Author
UBER logo
Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

Fair Value:US$11630.7% undervalued
8 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

WO
woodworthfund
KHC logo
woodworthfund on Kraft Heinz ·

Kraft Heinz (KHC): Less Drama, More Ketchup

Fair Value:US$3527.7% undervalued
27 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
LU
LunaRodas
DKS logo
LunaRodas on DICK'S Sporting Goods ·

DKS | DICK'S Sporting Goods: What They Said vs. What They Did

Fair Value:US$112.7710.2% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
PR
prajeeshprathap
MEDP logo
prajeeshprathap on Medpace Holdings ·

Why Medpace Outperforms Competitors in the Mid-Sized Biotech Niche

Fair Value:US$53614.6% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28023.9% undervalued
356 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9117.1% overvalued
204 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0945.1% undervalued
229 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

HA
HarishPK
EVER logo
HarishPK on EverQuote ·

Feedback welcome!

3
|
0
MA
MRNA logo
Madave on Moderna ·

Aged like wine

2
|
0