Is Sterlite Technologies (NSE:STLTECH) Using Too Much Debt?

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Sterlite Technologies Limited (NSE:STLTECH) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

Advertisement

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

View our latest analysis for Sterlite Technologies

How Much Debt Does Sterlite Technologies Carry?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Sterlite Technologies had ₹35.3b of debt in September 2023, down from ₹37.6b, one year before. However, it also had ₹5.21b in cash, and so its net debt is ₹30.1b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
NSEI:STLTECH Debt to Equity History November 17th 2023

How Strong Is Sterlite Technologies' Balance Sheet?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Sterlite Technologies had liabilities of ₹51.2b due within 12 months, and liabilities of ₹12.0b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of ₹5.21b and ₹29.3b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total ₹28.7b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Sterlite Technologies has a market capitalization of ₹57.6b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

While Sterlite Technologies's debt to EBITDA ratio (3.1) suggests that it uses some debt, its interest cover is very weak, at 2.3, suggesting high leverage. It seems clear that the cost of borrowing money is negatively impacting returns for shareholders, of late. However, it should be some comfort for shareholders to recall that Sterlite Technologies actually grew its EBIT by a hefty 18,315%, over the last 12 months. If it can keep walking that path it will be in a position to shed its debt with relative ease. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Sterlite Technologies can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. In the last three years, Sterlite Technologies basically broke even on a free cash flow basis. While many companies do operate at break-even, we prefer see substantial free cash flow, especially if a it already has dead.

Our View

Neither Sterlite Technologies's ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT nor its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow gave us confidence in its ability to take on more debt. But its EBIT growth rate tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. We think that Sterlite Technologies's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. Not all risk is bad, as it can boost share price returns if it pays off, but this debt risk is worth keeping in mind. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example Sterlite Technologies has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit concerning) we think you should know about.

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About NSEI:STLTECH

Sterlite Technologies

Manufactures and sells telecom products in India and internationally.

Exceptional growth potential with mediocre balance sheet.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

CE
Ceazar
CNXU logo
Ceazar on Conexeu Sciences ·

This small biotech is developing technology that could potentially change how tissue is rebuilt

Fair Value:US$25.3451.9% undervalued
48 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
HE
HedgeY
PWR logo
HedgeY on Quanta Services ·

The Picks-and-Shovels Leader of the Grid Supercycle

Fair Value:US$7104.2% overvalued
52 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
FU
KRMN logo
FundamentalFlow on Karman Holdings ·

KRMN — Karman Space & Defense: Down 58% from Peak, Is the Market Mispricing a Hypergrowth Defense Compounder?

Fair Value:US$105.654.8% undervalued
34 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
DO
Double_Bubbler
IES logo
Double_Bubbler on Invinity Energy Systems ·

Invinity Energy Systems: All About That BESS

Fair Value:UK£161.9% undervalued
40 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

LO
Lou_Basenese
VTIX logo
Lou_Basenese on Virtuix Holdings ·

From a “Shark Tank” Snub to an Air Force “Yes”: Why Virtuix at $3.50 May Be the Market’sMost Mispriced AI Story

Fair Value:US$7.551.2% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
BR
SPCX logo
browser on Space Exploration Technologies ·

SpaceX: A Sober Look at Catalysts, Risks, and Long‑Term Value After the IPO

Fair Value:US$0.4633.5k% overvalued
2 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
RO
RockeTeller
AMQ logo
RockeTeller on Abitibi Metals ·

Abitibi Metals’ High-Grade B26 Polymetallic Deposit Trading at a Fraction of Peers, 96% Undervalued?

Fair Value:CA$1.2949.6% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

MA
martinarauz
NU logo
martinarauz on Nu Holdings ·

Investment Analysis (May 2026)

Fair Value:US$22.7444.1% undervalued
67 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
HA
HarishPK
ADBE logo
HarishPK on Adobe ·

Adobe: A Probabilistic Case for Undervaluation

Fair Value:US$319.9639.0% undervalued
60 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative
NI
niteco
HON logo
niteco on Honeywell International ·

Honeywell - The Demand-Side of the AI Infrastructure

Fair Value:US$320.1928.5% undervalued
52 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
19 users have liked this narrative