Is Sharp Chucks and Machines Limited's (NSE:SCML) ROE Of 9.5% Concerning?

While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. We'll use ROE to examine Sharp Chucks and Machines Limited (NSE:SCML), by way of a worked example.

Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.

Advertisement

How Is ROE Calculated?

ROE can be calculated by using the formula:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Sharp Chucks and Machines is:

9.5% = ₹79m ÷ ₹838m (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025).

The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. That means that for every ₹1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated ₹0.09 in profit.

Check out our latest analysis for Sharp Chucks and Machines

Does Sharp Chucks and Machines Have A Good ROE?

By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. As is clear from the image below, Sharp Chucks and Machines has a lower ROE than the average (14%) in the Machinery industry.

roe
NSEI:SCML Return on Equity October 17th 2025

That's not what we like to see. However, a low ROE is not always bad. If the company's debt levels are moderate to low, then there's still a chance that returns can be improved via the use of financial leverage. When a company has low ROE but high debt levels, we would be cautious as the risk involved is too high. Our risks dashboard should have the 5 risks we have identified for Sharp Chucks and Machines.

How Does Debt Impact Return On Equity?

Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.

Combining Sharp Chucks and Machines' Debt And Its 9.5% Return On Equity

It's worth noting the high use of debt by Sharp Chucks and Machines, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 1.40. With a fairly low ROE, and significant use of debt, it's hard to get excited about this business at the moment. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it.

Conclusion

Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.

But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. You can see how the company has grow in the past by looking at this FREE detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About NSEI:SCML

Sharp Chucks and Machines

Manufactures and sells hand and machine tools.

Acceptable track record with mediocre balance sheet.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

ST
stuart_roberts
UG logo
stuart_roberts on Upside Gold ·

An Undervalued 3.3Moz Gold Project in Canada

Fair Value:CA$5.0768.0% undervalued
284 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
41 users have liked this narrative
GO
QS logo
GoldenSands on QuantumScape ·

QuantumScape: A Mispriced Deep‑Tech Inflection Point With Multi‑Billion‑Dollar Optionality

Fair Value:US$8591.3% undervalued
90 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
23 users have liked this narrative
TO
Tokyo
ABI logo
Tokyo on Anheuser-Busch InBev ·

EU#8 - Anheuser-Busch InBev: Courage, Capital, and the Discipline to Build an Empire

Fair Value:€89.4524.2% undervalued
7 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative
OS
oscargarcia
AMZN logo
oscargarcia on Amazon.com ·

The capitalist colossus that makes your parcels magically appear, powers half the internet, and knows your shopping habits.

Fair Value:US$2803.2% undervalued
62 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
2 users have liked this narrative