Stock Analysis

Is LAMDA Development (ATH:LAMDA) Using Too Much Debt?

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, LAMDA Development S.A. (ATH:LAMDA) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

Advertisement

When Is Debt A Problem?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

How Much Debt Does LAMDA Development Carry?

As you can see below, LAMDA Development had €1.18b of debt, at June 2025, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. On the flip side, it has €661.3m in cash leading to net debt of about €522.6m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
ATSE:LAMDA Debt to Equity History October 11th 2025

How Healthy Is LAMDA Development's Balance Sheet?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that LAMDA Development had liabilities of €1.16b falling due within a year, and liabilities of €2.21b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of €661.3m as well as receivables valued at €247.9m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by €2.46b.

This deficit casts a shadow over the €1.29b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, LAMDA Development would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

See our latest analysis for LAMDA Development

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

LAMDA Development's debt is 2.6 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 3.7 times over. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. Looking on the bright side, LAMDA Development boosted its EBIT by a silky 86% in the last year. Like a mother's loving embrace of a newborn that sort of growth builds resilience, putting the company in a stronger position to manage its debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine LAMDA Development's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last two years, LAMDA Development recorded free cash flow worth a fulsome 88% of its EBIT, which is stronger than we'd usually expect. That puts it in a very strong position to pay down debt.

Our View

We feel some trepidation about LAMDA Development's difficulty level of total liabilities, but we've got positives to focus on, too. To wit both its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and EBIT growth rate were encouraging signs. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that LAMDA Development is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for LAMDA Development that you should be aware of.

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About ATSE:LAMDA

LAMDA Development

Lamda Development S.A., together with its subsidiaries, engages in the investment in, development, and project management activities in the commercial real estate market in Greece and internationally.

Undervalued with adequate balance sheet.

Advertisement