- Denmark
- /
- Commercial Services
- /
- CPSE:IMAIL
The Returns On Capital At InterMail (CPH:IMAIL) Don't Inspire Confidence
What underlying fundamental trends can indicate that a company might be in decline? A business that's potentially in decline often shows two trends, a return on capital employed (ROCE) that's declining, and a base of capital employed that's also declining. Trends like this ultimately mean the business is reducing its investments and also earning less on what it has invested. And from a first read, things don't look too good at InterMail (CPH:IMAIL), so let's see why.
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
Just to clarify if you're unsure, ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. To calculate this metric for InterMail, this is the formula:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
0.012 = kr.1.3m ÷ (kr.155m - kr.47m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2020).
So, InterMail has an ROCE of 1.2%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Commercial Services industry average of 10%.
Check out our latest analysis for InterMail
Historical performance is a great place to start when researching a stock so above you can see the gauge for InterMail's ROCE against it's prior returns. If you'd like to look at how InterMail has performed in the past in other metrics, you can view this free graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
What The Trend Of ROCE Can Tell Us
The trend of returns that InterMail is generating are raising some concerns. The company used to generate 5.3% on its capital five years ago but it has since fallen noticeably. In addition to that, InterMail is now employing 50% less capital than it was five years ago. The combination of lower ROCE and less capital employed can indicate that a business is likely to be facing some competitive headwinds or seeing an erosion to its moat. If these underlying trends continue, we wouldn't be too optimistic going forward.
The Key Takeaway
To see InterMail reducing the capital employed in the business in tandem with diminishing returns, is concerning. Long term shareholders who've owned the stock over the last five years have experienced a 60% depreciation in their investment, so it appears the market might not like these trends either. Unless there is a shift to a more positive trajectory in these metrics, we would look elsewhere.
On a final note, we found 2 warning signs for InterMail (1 shouldn't be ignored) you should be aware of.
If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.
If you decide to trade InterMail, use the lowest-cost* platform that is rated #1 Overall by Barron’s, Interactive Brokers. Trade stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds on 135 markets, all from a single integrated account. Promoted
New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts
Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.
• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies
Or build your own from over 50 metrics.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
*Interactive Brokers Rated Lowest Cost Broker by StockBrokers.com Annual Online Review 2020
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com.
About CPSE:IMAIL
InterMail
Provides communication and marketing services in the Nordic region and rest of Europe.
Mediocre balance sheet and slightly overvalued.