Stock Analysis

Is Mineral Resources (ASX:MIN) Using Too Much Debt?

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies Mineral Resources Limited (ASX:MIN) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

Check out our latest analysis for Mineral Resources

How Much Debt Does Mineral Resources Carry?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2022 Mineral Resources had debt of AU$2.82b, up from AU$946.6m in one year. However, it also had AU$2.43b in cash, and so its net debt is AU$387.5m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
ASX:MIN Debt to Equity History December 27th 2022

How Healthy Is Mineral Resources' Balance Sheet?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Mineral Resources had liabilities of AU$913.6m due within 12 months, and liabilities of AU$3.63b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of AU$2.43b as well as receivables valued at AU$627.1m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling AU$1.48b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

Since publicly traded Mineral Resources shares are worth a very impressive total of AU$15.1b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

Looking at its net debt to EBITDA of 0.42 and interest cover of 5.8 times, it seems to us that Mineral Resources is probably using debt in a pretty reasonable way. But the interest payments are certainly sufficient to have us thinking about how affordable its debt is. Shareholders should be aware that Mineral Resources's EBIT was down 61% last year. If that decline continues then paying off debt will be harder than selling foie gras at a vegan convention. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Mineral Resources's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Mineral Resources barely recorded positive free cash flow, in total. While many companies do operate at break-even, we prefer see substantial free cash flow, especially if a it already has dead.

Our View

Mineral Resources's struggle to grow its EBIT had us second guessing its balance sheet strength, but the other data-points we considered were relatively redeeming. In particular, its net debt to EBITDA was re-invigorating. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think Mineral Resources's debt poses some risks to the business. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Mineral Resources (1 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

The New Payments ETF Is Live on NASDAQ:

Money is moving to real-time rails, and a newly listed ETF now gives investors direct exposure. Fast settlement. Institutional custody. Simple access.

Explore how this launch could reshape portfolios

Sponsored Content

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About ASX:MIN

Mineral Resources

Together with subsidiaries, provides mining services in Australia, Asia, and internationally.

Reasonable growth potential and fair value.

Weekly Picks

WO
MGPI logo
woodworthfund on MGP Ingredients ·

THE KINGDOM OF BROWN GOODS: WHY MGPI IS BEING CRUSHED BY INVENTORY & PRIMED FOR RESURRECTION

Fair Value:US$4035.0% undervalued
23 users have followed this narrative
4 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
DO
Double_Bubbler
EVTL logo
Double_Bubbler on Vertical Aerospace ·

Why Vertical Aerospace (NYSE: EVTL) is Worth Possibly Over 13x its Current Price

Fair Value:US$6090.4% undervalued
23 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative
TI
TickerTickle
ORCL logo
TickerTickle on Oracle ·

The Quiet Giant That Became AI’s Power Grid

Fair Value:US$389.8151.3% undervalued
43 users have followed this narrative
4 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

DO
Double_Bubbler
EVTL logo
Double_Bubbler on Vertical Aerospace ·

Why Vertical Aerospace (NYSE: EVTL) is Worth Possibly Over 13x its Current Price

Fair Value:US$6090.4% undervalued
23 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
IM
HOH logo
Imthetxarbi on High Arctic Overseas Holdings ·

Deep Value Multi Bagger Opportunity

Fair Value:CA$471.5% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AG
Agricola
EXN logo
Agricola on Excellon Resources ·

A case for CA$31.80 (undiluted), aka 8,616% upside from CA$0.37 (an 86 bagger!).

Fair Value:CA$31.898.8% undervalued
2 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

TH
TheWallstreetKing
MVIS logo
TheWallstreetKing on MicroVision ·

MicroVision will explode future revenue by 380.37% with a vision towards success

Fair Value:US$6098.4% undervalued
120 users have followed this narrative
11 users have commented on this narrative
22 users have liked this narrative
RO
RockeTeller
SCZ logo
RockeTeller on Santacruz Silver Mining ·

Crazy Undervalued 42 Baggers Silver Play (Active & Running Mine)

Fair Value:CA$8683.7% undervalued
78 users have followed this narrative
8 users have commented on this narrative
21 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
NVDA logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

Fair Value:US$250.3930.1% undervalued
965 users have followed this narrative
6 users have commented on this narrative
25 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

DE
IVN logo
Defiant on Ivanhoe Mines ·

The Kamoa-Kakula mine is utilizing the Lobito Atlantic Railway Corridor to transport its copper concentrate to the deep-water Atlantic Ocean port of Lobito in Angola. This rail link provides a significantly shorter, quicker, and more cost-effective export route compared to previous methods. Key Details :) Route: The railway runs approximately 1,739 kilometers from Kolwezi in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to the port of Lobito in Angola. The line passes within five kilometers of the Kamoa-Kakula mining complex. Benefits: Reduced Distance & Time: The distance to Lobito is roughly half that to the previously used port of Durban, South Africa. An initial trial shipment by rail took only eight days, compared to the 40 to 50 days typical for road transport to Durban. Cost Efficiency: Logistics currently account for about 30% of Kamoa-Kakula's total cash costs, a figure expected to decrease significantly with increased rail usage. Environmental Impact: Transportation by rail is more energy-efficient and less carbon-intensive than long-haul trucking. SADLY zero action from DRC in 2025 to spend a few bucks ($100M) and cut the cost of Trucking (Logistics) in half... Smelter gets Volumes down from 30% concentrate to 99% Blister Copper and cuts out the Middle Men. Solar Power looks promising 60MW in 2026. The Real Prize is Western Forelands... 40+years of 1 Billion pounds of copper with about 90% working interest and very high grades (3% overall) and the size of the prize doubled in May 2025 when disaster struck Kamoa Kakula complex. We'll see if production grows back to 600,000 Tonnes/year or x2200 = 1.32 Billion lbs of copper per year... from 400kT = 880 million lbs per year in 2025. 40% w.i. = 350 million lbs to Ivanhoe. in comparison... The Vicuña copper district has massive resources, with overall averages around 0.35% copper in measured/indicated (M&I) and 0.32% in inferred, but features much higher-grade cores, like Filo del Sol's M&I at 0.74% Cu.

0
|
0