Stock Analysis

Read This Before Buying CSR Limited (ASX:CSR) For Its Dividend

Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and you could win a $250 gift card!

Could CSR Limited (ASX:CSR) be an attractive dividend share to own for the long haul? Investors are often drawn to strong companies with the idea of reinvesting the dividends. If you are hoping to live on your dividends, it's important to be more stringent with your investments than the average punter. Regular readers know we like to apply the same approach to each dividend stock, and we hope you'll find our analysis useful.

A high yield and a long history of paying dividends is an appealing combination for CSR. It would not be a surprise to discover that many investors buy it for the dividends. The company also bought back stock equivalent to around 0.5% of market capitalisation this year. Some simple analysis can reduce the risk of holding CSR for its dividend, and we'll focus on the most important aspects below.

Click the interactive chart for our full dividend analysis

ASX:CSR Historical Dividend Yield, June 28th 2019
ASX:CSR Historical Dividend Yield, June 28th 2019

Payout ratios

Companies (usually) pay dividends out of their earnings. If a company is paying more than it earns, the dividend might have to be cut. Comparing dividend payments to a company's net profit after tax is a simple way of reality-checking whether a dividend is sustainable. Looking at the data, we can see that 94% of CSR's profits were paid out as dividends in the last 12 months. This is quite a high payout ratio that suggests the dividend is not well covered by earnings.

In addition to comparing dividends against profits, we should inspect whether the company generated enough cash to pay its dividend. CSR paid out 306% of its free cash flow last year, suggesting the dividend is poorly covered by cash flow. Paying out more than 100% of your free cash flow in dividends is generally not a long-term, sustainable state of affairs, so we think shareholders should watch this metric closely. Cash is slightly more important than profit from a dividend perspective, but given CSR's payouts were not well covered by either earnings or cash flow, we would definitely be concerned about the sustainability of this dividend.

Dividend Volatility

From the perspective of an income investor who wants to earn dividends for many years, there is not much point buying a stock if its dividend is regularly cut or is not reliable. CSR has been paying dividends for a long time, but for the purpose of this analysis, we only examine the past 10 years of payments. The dividend has been cut by more than 20% on at least one occasion historically. During the past ten-year period, the first annual payment was AU$0.23 in 2009, compared to AU$0.26 last year. Dividends per share have grown at approximately 1.5% per year over this time. CSR's dividend payments have fluctuated, so it hasn't grown 1.5% every year, but the CAGR is a useful rule of thumb for approximating the historical growth.

We're glad to see the dividend has risen, but with a limited rate of growth and fluctuations in the payments, we don't think this is an attractive combination.

Dividend Growth Potential

With a relatively unstable dividend, it's even more important to evaluate if earnings per share (EPS) are growing - it's not worth taking the risk on a dividend getting cut, unless you might be rewarded with larger dividends in future. CSR has grown its earnings per share at 9.6% per annum over the past five years. Although per-share earnings are growing at a credible rate, virtually all of the income is being paid out as dividends to shareholders. This is okay, but may limit growth in the company's future dividend payments.

Conclusion

When we look at a dividend stock, we need to form a judgement on whether the dividend will grow, if the company is able to maintain it in a wide range of economic circumstances, and if the dividend payout is sustainable. We're a bit uncomfortable with CSR paying out a high percentage of both its cashflow and earnings. Next, earnings growth has been good, but unfortunately the dividend has been cut at least once in the past. Overall, CSR falls short in several key areas here. Unless the investor has strong grounds for an alternative conclusion, we find it hard to get interested in a dividend stock with these characteristics.

Earnings growth generally bodes well for the future value of company dividend payments. See if the 11 CSR analysts we track are forecasting continued growth with our free report on analyst estimates for the company.

If you are a dividend investor, you might also want to look at our curated list of dividend stocks yielding above 3%.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.

About ASX:CSR

CSR

Engages in the manufacture and supply of building products for residential and commercial constructions in Australia and New Zealand.

Flawless balance sheet and slightly overvalued.

Weekly Picks

WO
MGPI logo
woodworthfund on MGP Ingredients ·

THE KINGDOM OF BROWN GOODS: WHY MGPI IS BEING CRUSHED BY INVENTORY & PRIMED FOR RESURRECTION

Fair Value:US$4036.0% undervalued
32 users have followed this narrative
7 users have commented on this narrative
10 users have liked this narrative
DO
Double_Bubbler
EVTL logo
Double_Bubbler on Vertical Aerospace ·

Why Vertical Aerospace (NYSE: EVTL) is Worth Possibly Over 13x its Current Price

Fair Value:US$6090.7% undervalued
30 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
20 users have liked this narrative
TI
TickerTickle
ORCL logo
TickerTickle on Oracle ·

The Quiet Giant That Became AI’s Power Grid

Fair Value:US$389.8152.6% undervalued
49 users have followed this narrative
4 users have commented on this narrative
10 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

AG
Agricola
SRL logo
Agricola on Scully Royalty ·

A case for USD $14.81 per share based on book value. Be warned, this is a micro-cap dependent on a single mine.

Fair Value:US$14.8158.1% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
CO
OXY logo
composite32 on Occidental Petroleum ·

Occidental Petroleum to Become Fairly Priced at $68.29 According to Future Projections

Fair Value:US$68.2941.1% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
RE
AGFB logo
RecMag on Agfa-Gevaert ·

Agfa-Gevaert is a digital and materials turnaround opportunity, with growth potential in ZIRFON, but carrying legacy risks.

Fair Value:€5.3991.2% undervalued
23 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

TH
TheWallstreetKing
MVIS logo
TheWallstreetKing on MicroVision ·

MicroVision will explode future revenue by 380.37% with a vision towards success

Fair Value:US$6098.5% undervalued
122 users have followed this narrative
11 users have commented on this narrative
22 users have liked this narrative
RO
RockeTeller
SCZ logo
RockeTeller on Santacruz Silver Mining ·

Crazy Undervalued 42 Baggers Silver Play (Active & Running Mine)

Fair Value:CA$8684.9% undervalued
81 users have followed this narrative
8 users have commented on this narrative
22 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
NVDA logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

Fair Value:US$250.3929.6% undervalued
972 users have followed this narrative
6 users have commented on this narrative
26 users have liked this narrative