Is Carter's (NYSE:CRI) Using Too Much Debt?

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital. So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that Carter's, Inc. (NYSE:CRI) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

Advertisement

When Is Debt A Problem?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for Carter's

How Much Debt Does Carter's Carry?

As you can see below, at the end of March 2020, Carter's had US$1.24b of debt, up from US$625.3m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$759.1m, its net debt is less, at about US$479.7m.

NYSE:CRI Historical Debt July 9th 2020
NYSE:CRI Historical Debt July 9th 2020

How Strong Is Carter's's Balance Sheet?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Carter's had liabilities of US$427.7m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$2.01b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$759.1m and US$221.9m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.46b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

Carter's has a market capitalization of US$3.54b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

Carter's has net debt of just 1.2 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 8.8 times the interest expense over the last year. It is just as well that Carter's's load is not too heavy, because its EBIT was down 24% over the last year. When it comes to paying off debt, falling earnings are no more useful than sugary sodas are for your health. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Carter's can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Carter's recorded free cash flow worth 71% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

Our View

Carter's's EBIT growth rate was a real negative on this analysis, although the other factors we considered were considerably better. There's no doubt that its ability to to convert EBIT to free cash flow is pretty flash. When we consider all the factors mentioned above, we do feel a bit cautious about Carter's's use of debt. While debt does have its upside in higher potential returns, we think shareholders should definitely consider how debt levels might make the stock more risky. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Carter's you should be aware of.

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

If you’re looking to trade Carter's, open an account with the lowest-cost* platform trusted by professionals, Interactive Brokers. Their clients from over 200 countries and territories trade stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds worldwide from a single integrated account.Promoted


New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
*Interactive Brokers Rated Lowest Cost Broker by StockBrokers.com Annual Online Review 2020


Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com.

MI
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it. cover
179
ZO
zoe_vi5fn

Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.

CO
connor_iwn1g

Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.

Andrew Legget

Great earnings season, but are the earnings real?

Great earnings season, but are the earnings real? cover
At first glance, this was the strongest earnings season in years. But when you look at where the growth actually came from, the story splits into two very different pictures.
10

About NYSE:CRI

Carter's

Designs, sources, and markets branded childrenswear in the United States and internationally.

Flawless balance sheet, good value and pays a dividend.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

LO
Lou_Basenese
ONCY logo
Lou_Basenese on Oncolytics Biotech ·

The Team Behind a $2 Billion Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Deal Just Took Over This $105 Million Cancer Biotech

Fair Value:US$3.575.5% undervalued
31 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
Recommended Voice
META logo
tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

Fair Value:US$5861.4% undervalued
63 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
34 users have liked this narrative
TA
Talos
Emerging Author
VOYG logo
Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

Fair Value:US$385.291.1% undervalued
65 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
IV
Emerging Author
UBER logo
Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

Fair Value:US$11632.1% undervalued
13 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

JO
John_Eric
BWMX logo
John_Eric on Betterware de MéxicoP.I. de ·

Only Two Analysts Cover This Stock.

Fair Value:US$54.6571.1% undervalued
2 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
RO
RockeTeller
KUYA logo
RockeTeller on Kuya Silver ·

Kuya Silver, The High-Octane Rocket With 15,372 g/t Silver + $12 AISC

Fair Value:CA$10.8493.3% undervalued
10 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
1 users have liked this narrative
RO
Robbo
ULVR logo
Robbo on Unilever ·

Unilever (LSE:ULVR), changes in the wind.

Fair Value:UK£42.2813.0% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
363 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9122.3% overvalued
212 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
Emerging Author
MELI logo
John_Eric on MercadoLibre ·

MercadoLibre and the Spreadsheet Trick That Decides Everything

Fair Value:US$7.31k73.1% undervalued
125 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

AL
BUSER logo
AlfredB on Bambuser ·

Very Intresting Times for Bambuser

1
|
0