Is Stock-Based Compensation Hurting Palantir (NYSE:PLTR) Shareholders?

  • Palantir executives have been selling heavily
  • The reliance on stock-based compensation could cause dilution
  • If the high growth that is forecasted actually occurs, it would offset the dilution

When you see an insider selling their shares in a stock you own, it tends to raise eyebrows. Why would they sell if they truly believe in the company? Have they lost faith in the future? First impressions are concerning, but there can be legitimate reasons for selling other than a lack of optimism in the company’s future prospects.

Maybe that individual wants to buy a house, maybe they are too exposed to the company and want to diversify a little or maybe they are simply liquidating the stocks they’ve received as part of their compensation. There could be any number of reasons as to why, and it’s a case by case basis. We often forget that these executives are investors too, and they need to manage their wealth and risk accordingly, no matter how bullish they are.

However, when we see a company that has broad selling amongst multiple insiders and a stock-based compensation (SBC) structure that seems to favour management over shareholders, it can be a little bit more concerning.

Palantir ( NYSE:PLTR ) is one such company. The company has gained the spotlight for its industry leading data analytics capabilities and its high profile customer base, but less focus has been on its compensation method or executives disposals of stock. It’s worth looking into the amount of selling and the SBC because over the long-term, it can impact shareholder returns.

Advertisement

Insider selling has been heavy

The company went public in September last year via a direct listing instead of an IPO, and because of that there were no new shares issued. Instead, existing shareholders were able to sell their stock and executives were allowed to sell up to one-fifth (20%) of their shareholding. Many executives took advantage of this and sold a combined $440m in the first 3 days of trading (this includes selling by some investment firms where executives are beneficial owners).

More recently, after the company’s lock-up period expired (a period where insiders weren’t allowed to sell specific shares), even more shares were sold. This lock-up period ended 3 days after the company posted its 2020 full year results in mid-February and executives offloaded over $600m worth of stock in the following week ( $504m of which was from related to investment funds where executives were beneficial owners, and won’t be included in the graph below).

We have the full breakdown of those insider sales over the last 12 months in our company report.


Source: NYSE:PLTR Insider Trading Volume - Simply Wall St

Reassuringly, these weren’t exactly panic sales. A number of them were either flagged in advance through 10b5-1 plans or were part of equity incentive plans (where executives receive stock as compensation). Regardless, that doesn’t mean we can dismiss these transactions, because there’s more to it that concerns shareholders.

For the 10b5-1 plans, these executives had organised to sell these shares in advance and it makes sense for them to occur shortly after the lock-up period expired, when they were finally allowed to. On top of those sales during the direct listing, some executives sold up to an additional 16% of their holdings, though many of these shares were received as stock-based compensation. Since the company has been private for 17 years, it’s not surprising that they now are making the most of the liquidity they have access to after being listed.

But there’s another cause for concern. Although the company is large, and stock based compensation is common amongst public companies, Palantir’s heavy reliance on this form of remuneration may be so much that it could hurt shareholder returns in the long run in the form of dilution.

Reliance on stock-based compensation

The company appears to favour SBC over salary for all its employees, and thanks to the direct listing in 2020, the stock-based compensation expense increased five-fold from $241m in 2019 to $1.2bn in 2020. There’s likely a few reasons for Palantir to favour SBC over salary. Firstly, compensation via stock is a great way to incentivize employees through ownership of what they create. Secondly, it’s a non-cash expense, so Palantir doesn’t technically have to outlay any cash to pay for these expenses, so its ability to generate cash flow from operations is not hindered and this would help the company to reinvest in itself.

For example, below is how the top three executives' remuneration was split, between salary, bonuses and stock awards for the year to December 2019.



Source:
Executive compensation on pg 176 of S-1 - NYSE:PLTR

However, this compensation method isn’t just for the executives. Most employees within Palantir reportedly receive similar structures: smaller salary but larger stock awards.

Because this SBC method involves the issuance of new stock, it’s increasing the number of slices in the pie. If a company is growing quickly enough or is large enough, this usually isn’t an issue. But we’ve seen a large increase with shares outstanding over the last year (581 million shares in December 2019 to 1.52 billion shares by December 2020 - thanks in large part to its direct listing) and the company’s 10-K indicates there could be more to come.

As at December 31 2020, there were 535m options outstanding with a weighted average remaining life of 8 years and an intrinsic value of $9.3 billion (Page 143). Those options equate to 34% of the current shares outstanding (December 2020) and if exercised, would dilute shareholders substantially.

If this method of remuneration is relied on too much, long term shareholders would see their percentage ownership of the company diminish due to the consistent dilution of their holding. However, the negative effect of dilution depends on how fast the company is or isn’t growing. If the size of the pie itself (the company) is growing more than the rate of dilution, then this dilution won’t be as harmful.

From that standpoint, Palantir’s future prospects make the dilution seem less intimidating. The forecasted annual earnings growth over the next year is 67% (which then moderates out to 2025), but it’s still much higher than the expected rate of dilution of around 4% per year.



Source:
NYSE:PLTR Earnings and Revenue Growth Forecasts - Simply Wall St

What this means for investors

Stock-based compensation is a common form of remuneration and has its place, when used appropriately. The large amounts of insider selling since the IPO can be attributed to this method and the fact that the company has been private for 17 years. While dilution is a concern, it appears somewhat contained by the fact that the company is expected to grow at a rapid rate that, if achieved, will more than offset the new shares expected to be issued in the coming years. With that in mind, while insider selling and SBC are important factors to keep an eye on, especially for a company like Palantir, they don’t appear to be huge concerns at this stage.

This article focused on insider selling and compensation, but it didn’t go in-depth on the company’s future. If you’d like to check out our full analysis of Palantir’s future prospects , you can find them within our company report.

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

Simply Wall St analyst Michael Paige and Simply Wall St have no position in any of the companies mentioned. This article is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

M
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

Three rival AI bosses just backed slowing AI down for safety. But who would a slowdown actually protect?

45
Andrew Legget

Are social media stocks the new Big Tobacco?

Are social media stocks the new Big Tobacco? cover
Greater regulatory scrutiny is catching up with digital platforms, posing a rising risk for social media stocks. But as Big Tobacco discovered, that's not always a bad outcome for shareholders.
14
MI
Michael Paige

Michael Paige

Michael is the Content Lead at Simply Wall St. With over 9 years of experience analysing and researching companies, Michael contributes to the creation of our analytical content and has done so as an equity analyst since 2020. He previously worked as an Associate Adviser at Ord Minnett, helping build and manage clients' portfolios, and has been investing personally since 2015.

About NasdaqGS:PLTR

Palantir Technologies

Palantir Technologies Inc. builds and deploys software platforms for the intelligence community to assist in counterterrorism investigations and operations in the United States, the United Kingdom, and internationally.

Exceptional growth potential with outstanding track record.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

CE
Ceazar
SPAI logo
Ceazar on Sparc AI ·

When GPS fails: this small cap is fixing a $54B drone problem

Fair Value:CA$5.2541.0% undervalued
191 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
29 users have liked this narrative
WE
WealthAP
Recommended Voice
CPRT logo
WealthAP on Copart ·

Copart’s Share Price Fell. Its Moat Did Not.

Fair Value:US$4938.9% undervalued
42 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
13 users have liked this narrative
IV
Emerging Author
ASML logo
Ivoed on ASML Holding ·

ASML’s China Sell-Off Looks Overdone, Yet The Shares Are Not Cheap

Fair Value:€1.78k16.9% undervalued
32 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
FU
FundamentalContrarianInvestor
UMG logo
FundamentalContrarianInvestor on Universal Music Group ·

Universal Music Group: The Market Is Pricing the Quarter, Not the Catalogue

Fair Value:€23.2537.2% undervalued
11 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

LU
LunaRodas
CODA logo
LunaRodas on Coda Octopus Group ·

CODA | Coda Octopus Group, Inc.: What They Said vs. What They Did

Fair Value:US$16.3238.6% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AS
AstrisCorporateAdvisory
7095 logo
AstrisCorporateAdvisory on Macbee Planet ·

Approaching an inflection point

Fair Value:JP¥1.08k10.3% overvalued
3 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
PI
PittTheYounger
VOW3 logo
PittTheYounger on Volkswagen ·

Volkswagen is ailing after several strategic mistakes

Fair Value:€84.544.0% undervalued
13 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
NVDA logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

Fair Value:US$302.8327.9% undervalued
1438 users have followed this narrative
8 users have commented on this narrative
35 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
GOOGL logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on Alphabet ·

GOOGL: AI Platform Expansion And Cloud Demand Will Support Durable Performance Amid Competitive Pressures

Fair Value:US$427.8920.9% undervalued
1620 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
19 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
AMZN logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on Amazon.com ·

AMZN: Acceleration In Cloud And AI Will Drive Margin Expansion Ahead

Fair Value:US$32721.5% undervalued
1638 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

AN
TPG0 logo
anthony_x0j2w on Platform Group SE KGaA ·

Hello,(I am a shareholder).I spent the summer investigating in whatever I was able to find in the press, the trustee, or legal, and comparing it to FS Benner's declaration/transcripts:press: MM has a tendancy to use facts, modify them and turn them the way they want: 100% of their claims against TPG0 is traçable factually, 80% is flawed and interpreted. Example are numerous: 11M loans banks to be paid seems right, but it has not been an issue at all, it has been paid in full. (and it happens all the time in every business...); the previous HR becoming a financial director in the article herself being attacked by TPG on the legal side; the wrong address of curator (if truly announced by TPG).Trustee: according to my research (which can be incomplete) no communication to the Nordic trustee (hereby, bond holders) has been done on a, indebtedness (late payment) > 1M€, which is their obligation by contract (clause 14.d - https://corporate.the-platform-group.com/bond/) => this is a sign of a huge lie and fraud, or the sign that there is no indebtedness > 1M€ over the whole TPG group.Legal: still awaiting for an answer, probable that I won't get it.VALUATIONYou can spent hours working the fundamentals, if they're flawed...the thesis falls.Anyway, I always substracts the badwill (that I consider non-current - you have it in the CFS) & non-controlling interests from my valuation:Earnings ~22MFCF ~40M€The financial statements are not the issue here, we are more on an cheap option on the sincerity of the accounts that a real valuation. Unfortunately, these are unverifiable elements, hence the low price./!\ Careful:the accounts are consolidated and skip the subsidiaries issues...Careful with the business model: TPG0 is a financial holding that acquire subsidiaries, hold the debt, and has no operations. 100% of the Cash Flow comes from subs' dividends => it is a risk here, more a plumber risk than an operational one, but nevertheless...The auditor is too small, and managed by the same firm than before, with 140K€/year commission => it's too low, nobody external really reviewed what Benner and his team are doing internallycapital increase do not go through the CFS, but through change in equity AND equity in the BSIf the equity stays low too long, the WACC increase will be unbearable (I have a 30% global, with a 118% on equity): diluting is expensive => TPG machine can stay broken for a while.Most of the people I talk with never saw this, while this is ESSENTIAL to Benner's business model.SEVERAL EVENTS THAT COULD CHANGE:AEP is being audited by KPMG: if Benner plays the "we will propose KPMG to our shareholders BEOY", this can increase the trust in him significantly/KPMG (or other) to validate the 2026 IFRS accounts & having a word on HGB's: though still consolidated, at least we'll know...AEP being eventually acquired: while it carries a high integration risk due to its size, they talked about it so many times, that trust goes with it.Without this combination of event, the equity is doomed to stay at this level, IMO.Do not forget to also follow the bond: with TPG's announced safe harbor plan for buyback (25% of daily exchange), it is also interesting to check this illiquid and retail market: https://live.deutsche-boerse.com/bond/no0013256834-the-platform-group-ag-8-875-24-28?mic=XFRA

1
|
0