We Think That There Are Issues Underlying Oracle's (NYSE:ORCL) Earnings

Investors were disappointed with Oracle Corporation's (NYSE:ORCL) earnings, despite the strong profit numbers. We think that the market might be paying attention to some underlying factors that they find to be concerning.

This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality.

A Closer Look At Oracle's Earnings

One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

Oracle has an accrual ratio of 0.33 for the year to May 2026. Therefore, we know that it's free cashflow was significantly lower than its statutory profit, raising questions about how useful that profit figure really is. Even though it reported a profit of US$17.0b, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through US$24b in the last year. We also note that Oracle's free cash flow was actually negative last year as well, so we could understand if shareholders were bothered by its outflow of US$24b.

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

Our Take On Oracle's Profit Performance

As we discussed above, we think Oracle's earnings were not supported by free cash flow, which might concern some investors. For this reason, we think that Oracle's statutory profits may be a bad guide to its underlying earnings power, and might give investors an overly positive impression of the company. But on the bright side, its earnings per share have grown at an extremely impressive rate over the last three years. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. If you'd like to know more about Oracle as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. Our analysis shows 2 warning signs for Oracle (1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) and we strongly recommend you look at them before investing.

Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of Oracle's profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.