Is Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) Using Too Much Debt?

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital. When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Minerals Technologies Inc. (NYSE:MTX) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

Advertisement

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for Minerals Technologies

What Is Minerals Technologies's Net Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Minerals Technologies had US$933.9m of debt in December 2019, down from US$1.02b, one year before. However, it also had US$243.2m in cash, and so its net debt is US$690.7m.

NYSE:MTX Historical Debt April 8th 2020
NYSE:MTX Historical Debt April 8th 2020

A Look At Minerals Technologies's Liabilities

According to the last reported balance sheet, Minerals Technologies had liabilities of US$398.5m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$1.28b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$243.2m as well as receivables valued at US$376.2m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.06b.

This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of US$1.19b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Minerals Technologies's use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

Minerals Technologies has net debt worth 2.1 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 5.4 times the interest expense. While that doesn't worry us too much, it does suggest the interest payments are somewhat of a burden. The bad news is that Minerals Technologies saw its EBIT decline by 10% over the last year. If earnings continue to decline at that rate then handling the debt will be more difficult than taking three children under 5 to a fancy pants restaurant. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Minerals Technologies can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Minerals Technologies produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 57% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

Our View

On the face of it, Minerals Technologies's level of total liabilities left us tentative about the stock, and its EBIT growth rate was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least it's pretty decent at converting EBIT to free cash flow; that's encouraging. Once we consider all the factors above, together, it seems to us that Minerals Technologies's debt is making it a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Minerals Technologies .

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

MI
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

Druckenmiller says cheap money's days are numbered. Boring, self-funding companies could be the opportunity.

Druckenmiller says cheap money's days are numbered. Boring, self-funding companies could be the opportunity. cover
1311
DE
devon_jd150

Leverage on its own is close to useless as a screen right now, because so much corporate debt was termed out at 2 to 3% and has not repriced. A business at three times leverage with nothing due until 2031 is in a completely different position from the same ratio rolling next year. Screen on weighted average maturity and the schedule behind it.

LE
LeverageIsLovely

In my view, Insurance companies are best positioned for this.

Mitchell Lawler

Which payment stocks actually get paid?

Which payment stocks actually get paid? cover
Every new payment app was supposed to kill Visa and Mastercard. Instead, they got bigger. So what does that mean for the payment stocks on your radar?
32

About NYSE:MTX

Minerals Technologies

Develops, produces, and markets various mineral, mineral-based products and services.

Undervalued with excellent balance sheet.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

RI
Rick_Orford
FJET logo
Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

Fair Value:US$522.8% undervalued
67 users have followed this narrative
4 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
Recommended Voice
META logo
tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

Fair Value:US$5862.7% undervalued
47 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
34 users have liked this narrative
TA
Talos
Emerging Author
VOYG logo
Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

Fair Value:US$385.291.0% undervalued
31 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
IV
Emerging Author
UBER logo
Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

Fair Value:US$11630.7% undervalued
7 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

WO
woodworthfund
KHC logo
woodworthfund on Kraft Heinz ·

Kraft Heinz (KHC): Less Drama, More Ketchup

Fair Value:US$3527.7% undervalued
27 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
LU
LunaRodas
DKS logo
LunaRodas on DICK'S Sporting Goods ·

DKS | DICK'S Sporting Goods: What They Said vs. What They Did

Fair Value:US$112.7710.2% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
PR
prajeeshprathap
MEDP logo
prajeeshprathap on Medpace Holdings ·

Why Medpace Outperforms Competitors in the Mid-Sized Biotech Niche

Fair Value:US$53614.6% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28023.9% undervalued
354 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9117.1% overvalued
202 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0945.1% undervalued
228 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

HA
HarishPK
EVER logo
HarishPK on EverQuote ·

Feedback welcome!

3
|
0
MA
MRNA logo
Madave on Moderna ·

Aged like wine

2
|
0