Is Scientific Games Corporation (NASDAQ:SGMS) Potentially Undervalued?

Scientific Games Corporation (NASDAQ:SGMS), might not be a large cap stock, but it saw significant share price movement during recent months on the NASDAQGS, rising to highs of US$85.68 and falling to the lows of US$54.83. Some share price movements can give investors a better opportunity to enter into the stock, and potentially buy at a lower price. A question to answer is whether Scientific Games' current trading price of US$59.01 reflective of the actual value of the mid-cap? Or is it currently undervalued, providing us with the opportunity to buy? Let’s take a look at Scientific Games’s outlook and value based on the most recent financial data to see if there are any catalysts for a price change.

See our latest analysis for Scientific Games

What's the opportunity in Scientific Games?

The stock seems fairly valued at the moment according to my valuation model. It’s trading around 2.60% above my intrinsic value, which means if you buy Scientific Games today, you’d be paying a relatively fair price for it. And if you believe that the stock is really worth $57.52, there’s only an insignificant downside when the price falls to its real value. Although, there may be an opportunity to buy in the future. This is because Scientific Games’s beta (a measure of share price volatility) is high, meaning its price movements will be exaggerated relative to the rest of the market. If the market is bearish, the company’s shares will likely fall by more than the rest of the market, providing a prime buying opportunity.

What kind of growth will Scientific Games generate?

Investors looking for growth in their portfolio may want to consider the prospects of a company before buying its shares. Buying a great company with a robust outlook at a cheap price is always a good investment, so let’s also take a look at the company's future expectations. With profit expected to more than double over the next couple of years, the future seems bright for Scientific Games. It looks like higher cash flow is on the cards for the stock, which should feed into a higher share valuation.

What this means for you:

Are you a shareholder? SGMS’s optimistic future growth appears to have been factored into the current share price, with shares trading around its fair value. However, there are also other important factors which we haven’t considered today, such as the financial strength of the company. Have these factors changed since the last time you looked at the stock? Will you have enough conviction to buy should the price fluctuates below the true value?

Are you a potential investor? If you’ve been keeping tabs on SGMS, now may not be the most advantageous time to buy, given it is trading around its fair value. However, the positive outlook is encouraging for the company, which means it’s worth diving deeper into other factors such as the strength of its balance sheet, in order to take advantage of the next price drop.

With this in mind, we wouldn't consider investing in a stock unless we had a thorough understanding of the risks. Case in point: We've spotted 5 warning signs for Scientific Games you should be mindful of and 3 of them are significant.

If you are no longer interested in Scientific Games, you can use our free platform to see our list of over 50 other stocks with a high growth potential.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.