Advertisement
Should You Be Worried About Bittnet Systems SA's (BVB:BNET) 10% Return On Equity?
While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. We'll use ROE to examine Bittnet Systems SA (BVB:BNET), by way of a worked example.
Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.
View our latest analysis for Bittnet Systems
How To Calculate Return On Equity?
The formula for ROE is:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Bittnet Systems is:
10% = RON1.9m ÷ RON18m (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2020).
The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. So, this means that for every RON1 of its shareholder's investments, the company generates a profit of RON0.10.
Does Bittnet Systems Have A Good ROE?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. As shown in the graphic below, Bittnet Systems has a lower ROE than the average (13%) in the IT industry classification.
That's not what we like to see. Although, we think that a lower ROE could still mean that a company has the opportunity to better its returns with the use of leverage, provided its existing debt levels are low. A high debt company having a low ROE is a different story altogether and a risky investment in our books. Our risks dashboard should have the 2 risks we have identified for Bittnet Systems.
The Importance Of Debt To Return On Equity
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.
Bittnet Systems' Debt And Its 10% ROE
Bittnet Systems does use a high amount of debt to increase returns. It has a debt to equity ratio of 1.93. Its ROE is quite low, even with the use of significant debt; that's not a good result, in our opinion. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time.
Conclusion
Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. All else being equal, a higher ROE is better.
Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. Check the past profit growth by Bittnet Systems by looking at this visualization of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
If you’re looking to trade Bittnet Systems, open an account with the lowest-cost* platform trusted by professionals, Interactive Brokers. Their clients from over 200 countries and territories trade stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds worldwide from a single integrated account. Promoted
Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.
Discover if Bittnet Systems might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.
Access Free AnalysisThis article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
*Interactive Brokers Rated Lowest Cost Broker by StockBrokers.com Annual Online Review 2020
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
M
The Foxhole
Oil routes are being dismantled one by one. The durable winner could be the North American energy left standing.
2
Andrew LeggetMarket Insights
Are social media stocks the new Big Tobacco?
Greater regulatory scrutiny is catching up with digital platforms, posing a rising risk for social media stocks. But as Big Tobacco discovered, that's not always a bad outcome for shareholders.
14
About BVB:BNET
Bittnet Systems
Provides IT training and integration solutions in Romania.
Excellent balance sheet and fair value.
Market Insights
Advertisement
Weekly Picks
CE
Ceazar on Sparc AI ·
When GPS fails: this small cap is fixing a $54B drone problem
Fair Value:CA$5.2539.8% undervalued
193 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
29 likesusers have liked this narrative
WE
WealthAP on Copart ·
Copart’s Share Price Fell. Its Moat Did Not.
Fair Value:US$4935.2% undervalued
42 followersusers have followed this narrative
2 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
13 likesusers have liked this narrative
IV
Ivoed on ASML Holding ·
ASML’s China Sell-Off Looks Overdone, Yet The Shares Are Not Cheap
Fair Value:€1.78k22.0% undervalued
32 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
8 likesusers have liked this narrative
FU
FundamentalContrarianInvestor on Universal Music Group ·
Universal Music Group: The Market Is Pricing the Quarter, Not the Catalogue
Fair Value:€23.2536.4% undervalued
12 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
3 likesusers have liked this narrative
Recently Updated Narratives
RO
RockeTeller on Honey Badger Silver ·
Honey Badger: 766g/t AgEq, 5km of Tunnels, Mill Already There, Why September’s PEA Matters
Fair Value:CA$9.3393.2% undervalued
1 followerusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
1 likeusers have liked this narrative
WO
woodworthfund on Willamette Valley Vineyards ·
Willamette Valley Vineyards (WVVI): Not-So-Great Value
Fair Value:US$0.2850.0% overvalued
14 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
0 likesusers have liked this narrative
BR
Brunhilde_Wagner on Copart ·
Compounder to Cash Generator in Real Time
Fair Value:US$2526.9% overvalued
2 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
0 likesusers have liked this narrative
Popular Narratives
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·
NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026
Fair Value:US$302.8330.3% undervalued
1445 followersusers have followed this narrative
8 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
35 likesusers have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget on Alphabet ·
GOOGL: AI Platform Expansion And Cloud Demand Will Support Durable Performance Amid Competitive Pressures
Fair Value:US$427.8918.3% undervalued
1628 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
19 likesusers have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget on Amazon.com ·
AMZN: Acceleration In Cloud And AI Will Drive Margin Expansion Ahead
Fair Value:US$32722.5% undervalued
1644 followersusers have followed this narrative
1 commentusers have commented on this narrative
16 likesusers have liked this narrative
Trending Discussion
AN
anthony_x0j2w on Platform Group SE KGaA ·
Hello,(I am a shareholder).I spent the summer investigating in whatever I was able to find in the press, the trustee, or legal, and comparing it to FS Benner's declaration/transcripts:press: MM has a tendancy to use facts, modify them and turn them the way they want: 100% of their claims against TPG0 is traçable factually, 80% is flawed and interpreted. Example are numerous: 11M loans banks to be paid seems right, but it has not been an issue at all, it has been paid in full. (and it happens all the time in every business...); the previous HR becoming a financial director in the article herself being attacked by TPG on the legal side; the wrong address of curator (if truly announced by TPG).Trustee: according to my research (which can be incomplete) no communication to the Nordic trustee (hereby, bond holders) has been done on a, indebtedness (late payment) > 1M€, which is their obligation by contract (clause 14.d - https://corporate.the-platform-group.com/bond/) => this is a sign of a huge lie and fraud, or the sign that there is no indebtedness > 1M€ over the whole TPG group.Legal: still awaiting for an answer, probable that I won't get it.VALUATIONYou can spent hours working the fundamentals, if they're flawed...the thesis falls.Anyway, I always substracts the badwill (that I consider non-current - you have it in the CFS) & non-controlling interests from my valuation:Earnings ~22MFCF ~40M€The financial statements are not the issue here, we are more on an cheap option on the sincerity of the accounts that a real valuation. Unfortunately, these are unverifiable elements, hence the low price./!\ Careful:the accounts are consolidated and skip the subsidiaries issues...Careful with the business model: TPG0 is a financial holding that acquire subsidiaries, hold the debt, and has no operations. 100% of the Cash Flow comes from subs' dividends => it is a risk here, more a plumber risk than an operational one, but nevertheless...The auditor is too small, and managed by the same firm than before, with 140K€/year commission => it's too low, nobody external really reviewed what Benner and his team are doing internallycapital increase do not go through the CFS, but through change in equity AND equity in the BSIf the equity stays low too long, the WACC increase will be unbearable (I have a 30% global, with a 118% on equity): diluting is expensive => TPG machine can stay broken for a while.Most of the people I talk with never saw this, while this is ESSENTIAL to Benner's business model.SEVERAL EVENTS THAT COULD CHANGE:AEP is being audited by KPMG: if Benner plays the "we will propose KPMG to our shareholders BEOY", this can increase the trust in him significantly/KPMG (or other) to validate the 2026 IFRS accounts & having a word on HGB's: though still consolidated, at least we'll know...AEP being eventually acquired: while it carries a high integration risk due to its size, they talked about it so many times, that trust goes with it.Without this combination of event, the equity is doomed to stay at this level, IMO.Do not forget to also follow the bond: with TPG's announced safe harbor plan for buyback (25% of daily exchange), it is also interesting to check this illiquid and retail market: https://live.deutsche-boerse.com/bond/no0013256834-the-platform-group-ag-8-875-24-28?mic=XFRA
1
|0
CO
Constantin_Mar on Platform Group SE KGaA ·
Quite a lot of speculation presented as if it were evidence.You are combining alleged payment disputes, alleged bank actions, legal disputes with journalists and other unverified claims to imply that TPG’s financial reporting is somehow unreliable or that the company is approaching insolvency. That’s a very serious conclusion, but the evidence you’ve presented doesn’t establish it.TPG’s financial statements, share count, debt, cash flow and acquisitions can all be checked against official filings and corporate documents. That’s called due diligence. Repeating allegations and then pointing to a low P/E doesn’t prove anything.In fact, the P/E below 1 is precisely the reason the underlying numbers need to be investigated rather than dismissed. If you have documentary evidence that TPG’s reported figures are false, that banks actually cancelled the alleged facilities, or that the company is insolvent, publish the documents and numbers.Otherwise, this reads less like analysis and more like an attempt to create fear and selling pressure around a micro-cap stock.Claims require evidence. Allegations are not evidence.
1
|1
