Is Mabion (WSE:MAB) Using Too Much Debt?

By
Simply Wall St
Published
December 23, 2021
WSE:MAB
Source: Shutterstock

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Mabion S.A. (WSE:MAB) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

When Is Debt A Problem?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for Mabion

What Is Mabion's Net Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Mabion had debt of zł15.7m at the end of September 2021, a reduction from zł22.2m over a year. But it also has zł85.1m in cash to offset that, meaning it has zł69.4m net cash.

debt-equity-history-analysis
WSE:MAB Debt to Equity History December 23rd 2021

How Healthy Is Mabion's Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Mabion had liabilities of zł118.5m due within a year, and liabilities of zł57.4m falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had zł85.1m in cash and zł6.84m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total zł84.0m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

Of course, Mabion has a market capitalization of zł1.02b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse. Despite its noteworthy liabilities, Mabion boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load! The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Mabion can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

While it hasn't made a profit, at least Mabion booked its first revenue as a publicly listed company, in the last twelve months.

So How Risky Is Mabion?

By their very nature companies that are losing money are more risky than those with a long history of profitability. And we do note that Mabion had an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss, over the last year. Indeed, in that time it burnt through zł38m of cash and made a loss of zł51m. With only zł69.4m on the balance sheet, it would appear that its going to need to raise capital again soon. Overall, we'd say the stock is a bit risky, and we're usually very cautious until we see positive free cash flow. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Be aware that Mabion is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those shouldn't be ignored...

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

Discounted cash flow calculation for every stock

Simply Wall St does a detailed discounted cash flow calculation every 6 hours for every stock on the market, so if you want to find the intrinsic value of any company just search here. It’s FREE.

Make Confident Investment Decisions

Simply Wall St's Editorial Team provides unbiased, factual reporting on global stocks using in-depth fundamental analysis.
Find out more about our editorial guidelines and team.