Additional Considerations Required While Assessing CU-Tech's (KOSDAQ:376290) Strong Earnings

Despite posting some strong earnings, the market for CU-Tech Corporation's (KOSDAQ:376290) stock hasn't moved much. We did some digging, and we found some concerning factors in the details.

earnings-and-revenue-history
KOSDAQ:A376290 Earnings and Revenue History April 1st 2025
Advertisement

Zooming In On CU-Tech's Earnings

As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

For the year to December 2024, CU-Tech had an accrual ratio of 0.36. Unfortunately, that means its free cash flow was a lot less than its statutory profit, which makes us doubt the utility of profit as a guide. Over the last year it actually had negative free cash flow of ₩8.8b, in contrast to the aforementioned profit of ₩13.6b. We saw that FCF was ₩1.6b a year ago though, so CU-Tech has at least been able to generate positive FCF in the past. One positive for CU-Tech shareholders is that it's accrual ratio was significantly better last year, providing reason to believe that it may return to stronger cash conversion in the future. Shareholders should look for improved cashflow relative to profit in the current year, if that is indeed the case.

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of CU-Tech.

Our Take On CU-Tech's Profit Performance

As we discussed above, we think CU-Tech's earnings were not supported by free cash flow, which might concern some investors. For this reason, we think that CU-Tech's statutory profits may be a bad guide to its underlying earnings power, and might give investors an overly positive impression of the company. The silver lining is that its EPS growth over the last year has been really wonderful, even if it's not a perfect measure. The goal of this article has been to assess how well we can rely on the statutory earnings to reflect the company's potential, but there is plenty more to consider. If you want to do dive deeper into CU-Tech, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. When we did our research, we found 3 warning signs for CU-Tech (2 make us uncomfortable!) that we believe deserve your full attention.

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of CU-Tech's profit. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About KOSDAQ:A376290

CU-Tech

Develops, manufactures, and sells FPCB a'ssy products in Korea and internationally.

Flawless balance sheet, good value and pays a dividend.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

JO
Jolt_Communications
MYSE logo
Jolt_Communications on Myseum ·

The Future of Social Sharing Is Private and People Are Ready

Fair Value:US$7.9576.7% undervalued
37 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
TO
Tokyo
ASML logo
Tokyo on ASML Holding ·

EU#3 - From Philips Management Buyout to Europe’s Biggest Company

Fair Value:€1.31k9.0% undervalued
31 users have followed this narrative
4 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative
YI
BKNG logo
yiannisz on Booking Holdings ·

Booking Holdings: Why Ground-Level Travel Trends Still Favor the Platform Giants

Fair Value:US$5.47k15.0% undervalued
8 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative
CO
composite32
SHEL logo
composite32 on Shell ·

A fully integrated LNG business seems to be ignored by the market.

Fair Value:UK£36.122.7% undervalued
40 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

RE
PROX logo
RecMag on Proximus ·

Proximus: The State-Backed Backup Plan with 7% Gross Yield and 15% Currency Upside.

Fair Value:€17.1354.8% undervalued
37 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
CO
composite32
SGRO logo
composite32 on SEGRO ·

SEGRO's Revenue to Rise 14.7% Amidst Optimistic Growth Plans

Fair Value:UK£9.3918.8% undervalued
6 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AL
alex30free
BEIJ B logo
alex30free on Beijer Ref ·

The Green Consolidator

Fair Value:SEK 128.821.0% overvalued
2 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

WE
WealthAP
PYPL logo
WealthAP on PayPal Holdings ·

The "Sleeping Giant" Stumbles, Then Wakes Up

Fair Value:US$8249.1% undervalued
85 users have followed this narrative
6 users have commented on this narrative
35 users have liked this narrative
OO
NEO logo
OOO97 on Neo Performance Materials ·

Undervalued Key Player in Magnets/Rare Earth

Fair Value:CA$25.3320.9% undervalued
75 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
19 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
NVDA logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·

NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026

Fair Value:US$253.0228.7% undervalued
1050 users have followed this narrative
6 users have commented on this narrative
31 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

HE
Hemingway
AEVA logo
Hemingway on Aeva Technologies ·

NVDA+AEVA Agreement is a game changer for the AEVA stock even though it is just a partnership and does not have a roll out until 2028 (which means receivables as early as 2027, I would imagine) This agreement effectively moves the goal posts of profitability for AEVA much closer since this is in addition to the recent Forterra agreement, as well as the (previously announced) European carmaker agreement (which is believed to be Mercedes-Benz and estimated to be worth at least 1 billion in sales alone) Underneath all of this, AEVA has a pre-existing agreement with Daimler Truck. So business seems to be booming, especially with really big name brands…which tends to bring in even more brand names (and thus more agreements/contracts/announcements, etc). This dynamic often creates more coverage from analysts (often with upside stock initial coverage) that I believe will be occurring over the next 3 to 6 months (as professional traders/analysts often research for 2 to 3 months before initiating coverage of a new issue). I also feel that the above momentum increases the likelihood that companies that do not currently utilize 4G LIDAR technology might consider buying AEVA outright. Realistically, even with a substantial premium to the current stock price, the cost of AEVA would be a rounding error for the likes of a company such as Tesla, and certainly would allow them to maintain their technological edge as the competition for self-driving vehicles continues to heat up. However, I think it is equally possible for NVidea to decide to lock-in the AEVA technology for their upcoming autonomous hardware/software package by buying them outright. Obviously, the above factors and recent activity in the AEVA stock are cause for optimism. Of course, this all just one opinion , so please do your own due diligence. Disclaimer: I/We DO trade in this stock from time to time and I/we may (or may not have) a position currently, so again, please do your own due diligence.

0
|
0
US
AVGO logo
User on Broadcom ·

Net here,remains to be seen!

0
|
0
Advertisement