Stock Analysis

These Return Metrics Don't Make Shindaeyang Paper (KRX:016590) Look Too Strong

KOSE:A016590
Source: Shutterstock

If you're looking at a mature business that's past the growth phase, what are some of the underlying trends that pop up? Typically, we'll see the trend of both return on capital employed (ROCE) declining and this usually coincides with a decreasing amount of capital employed. This reveals that the company isn't compounding shareholder wealth because returns are falling and its net asset base is shrinking. So after glancing at the trends within Shindaeyang Paper (KRX:016590), we weren't too hopeful.

Advertisement

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on Shindaeyang Paper is:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

0.032 = ₩24b ÷ (₩896b - ₩125b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025).

Thus, Shindaeyang Paper has an ROCE of 3.2%. On its own that's a low return on capital but it's in line with the industry's average returns of 3.0%.

See our latest analysis for Shindaeyang Paper

roce
KOSE:A016590 Return on Capital Employed July 31st 2025

Historical performance is a great place to start when researching a stock so above you can see the gauge for Shindaeyang Paper's ROCE against it's prior returns. If you're interested in investigating Shindaeyang Paper's past further, check out this free graph covering Shindaeyang Paper's past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

What Can We Tell From Shindaeyang Paper's ROCE Trend?

We are a bit worried about the trend of returns on capital at Shindaeyang Paper. About five years ago, returns on capital were 14%, however they're now substantially lower than that as we saw above. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. This combination can be indicative of a mature business that still has areas to deploy capital, but the returns received aren't as high due potentially to new competition or smaller margins. So because these trends aren't typically conducive to creating a multi-bagger, we wouldn't hold our breath on Shindaeyang Paper becoming one if things continue as they have.

In Conclusion...

In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. Since the stock has skyrocketed 103% over the last five years, it looks like investors have high expectations of the stock. Regardless, we don't feel too comfortable with the fundamentals so we'd be steering clear of this stock for now.

One more thing: We've identified 4 warning signs with Shindaeyang Paper (at least 2 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding these would certainly be useful.

If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.