BasicNet First Half 2025 Earnings: €0.36 loss per share (vs €0.057 profit in 1H 2024)

August 05, 2025

Simply Wall St

BIT:BAN 1 Year Share Price vs Fair Value

Explore BasicNet's Fair Values from the Community and select yours

BasicNet (BIT:BAN) First Half 2025 Results

Key Financial Results

Revenue: €137.3m (down 4.2% from 1H 2024).
Net loss: €16.6m (down from €2.82m profit in 1H 2024).
€0.36 loss per share (down from €0.057 profit in 1H 2024).

We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free.

earnings-and-revenue-history — BIT:BAN Earnings and Revenue History August 5th 2025

All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period

BasicNet shares are down 7.2% from a week ago.

Risk Analysis

We don't want to rain on the parade too much, but we did also find 3 warning signs for BasicNet (1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) that you need to be mindful of.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if BasicNet might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

mitchell_lawler

A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

179

zoe_vi5fn2d

Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.

connor_iwn1g2d

Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.