Stock Analysis

We Think Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) (TLV:BSEN) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt

TASE:BSEN
Source: Shutterstock

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) Ltd (TLV:BSEN) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

View our latest analysis for Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)

What Is Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s Net Debt?

As you can see below, Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) had US$74.3m of debt at June 2023, down from US$78.3m a year prior. And it doesn't have much cash, so its net debt is about the same.

debt-equity-history-analysis
TASE:BSEN Debt to Equity History December 1st 2023

A Look At Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s Liabilities

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) had liabilities of US$83.0m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$39.5m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$210.0k as well as receivables valued at US$32.9m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$89.4m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) has a market capitalization of US$249.5m, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

While Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s debt to EBITDA ratio (3.1) suggests that it uses some debt, its interest cover is very weak, at 2.0, suggesting high leverage. It seems clear that the cost of borrowing money is negatively impacting returns for shareholders, of late. The silver lining is that Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) grew its EBIT by 145% last year, which nourishing like the idealism of youth. If that earnings trend continues it will make its debt load much more manageable in the future. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) recorded free cash flow of 37% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

Our View

When it comes to the balance sheet, the standout positive for Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) was the fact that it seems able to grow its EBIT confidently. But the other factors we noted above weren't so encouraging. In particular, interest cover gives us cold feet. Looking at all this data makes us feel a little cautious about Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997)'s debt levels. While debt does have its upside in higher potential returns, we think shareholders should definitely consider how debt levels might make the stock more risky. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) (3 are potentially serious) you should be aware of.

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Bet Shemesh Engines Holdings (1997) might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.