- Hong Kong
- /
- Renewable Energy
- /
- SEHK:686
Do Directors Own Panda Green Energy Group Limited (HKG:686) Shares?
If you want to know who really controls Panda Green Energy Group Limited (HKG:686), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. We also tend to see lower insider ownership in companies that were previously publicly owned.
Panda Green Energy Group is a smaller company with a market capitalization of HK$3.1b, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutions own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Panda Green Energy Group.
Check out our latest analysis for Panda Green Energy Group
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Panda Green Energy Group?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
Panda Green Energy Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own 18% of the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Panda Green Energy Group's historic earnings and revenue, below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
Panda Green Energy Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Beijing Energy Holding Co., Ltd. with 32% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Huaqing Solar Power Limited and China Huarong Asset Management Co., Ltd., Asset Management Arm, holding 14% and 9.4%, respectively.
Further, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a combined ownership of 56% in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
Insider Ownership Of Panda Green Energy Group
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Panda Green Energy Group Limited. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It appears that the board holds about HK$6.1m worth of stock. This compares to a market capitalization of HK$3.1b. Many investors in smaller companies prefer to see the board more heavily invested. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
General Public Ownership
The general public holds a 14% stake in 686. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
Private Company Ownership
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 62%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
Public Company Ownership
It appears to us that public companies own 6.2% of 686. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
Next Steps:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Panda Green Energy Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Panda Green Energy Group (of which 1 doesn't sit too well with us!) you should know about.
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
Love or hate this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.
About SEHK:686
Beijing Energy International Holding
An investment holding company, engages in the investment, development, operation, and management of power plants and other clean energy projects in the People’s Republic of China, Australia, and Vietnam.
Slightly overvalued unattractive dividend payer.
Market Insights
Community Narratives
