JD Logistics (HKG:2618) Seems To Use Debt Rather Sparingly

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that JD Logistics, Inc. (HKG:2618) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

See our latest analysis for JD Logistics

What Is JD Logistics's Net Debt?

As you can see below, at the end of June 2024, JD Logistics had CN¥24.7b of debt, up from CN¥9.97b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it does have CN¥35.6b in cash offsetting this, leading to net cash of CN¥10.9b.

A Look At JD Logistics' Liabilities

The latest balance sheet data shows that JD Logistics had liabilities of CN¥35.2b due within a year, and liabilities of CN¥17.9b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of CN¥35.6b and CN¥15.7b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by CN¥1.89b.

Since publicly traded JD Logistics shares are worth a very impressive total of CN¥76.9b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse. Despite its noteworthy liabilities, JD Logistics boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!

It was also good to see that despite losing money on the EBIT line last year, JD Logistics turned things around in the last 12 months, delivering and EBIT of CN¥5.6b. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine JD Logistics's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. JD Logistics may have net cash on the balance sheet, but it is still interesting to look at how well the business converts its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, because that will influence both its need for, and its capacity to manage debt. Happily for any shareholders, JD Logistics actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT over the last year. That sort of strong cash generation warms our hearts like a puppy in a bumblebee suit.

Summing Up

We could understand if investors are concerned about JD Logistics's liabilities, but we can be reassured by the fact it has has net cash of CN¥10.9b. The cherry on top was that in converted 251% of that EBIT to free cash flow, bringing in CN¥14b. So we don't think JD Logistics's use of debt is risky. Another factor that would give us confidence in JD Logistics would be if insiders have been buying shares: if you're conscious of that signal too, you can find out instantly by clicking this link.

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.