Stock Analysis

Is COSCO SHIPPING Ports (HKG:1199) Using Too Much Debt?

SEHK:1199
Source: Shutterstock

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that COSCO SHIPPING Ports Limited (HKG:1199) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

See our latest analysis for COSCO SHIPPING Ports

What Is COSCO SHIPPING Ports's Debt?

As you can see below, COSCO SHIPPING Ports had US$3.10b of debt, at June 2022, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. On the flip side, it has US$1.10b in cash leading to net debt of about US$2.00b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
SEHK:1199 Debt to Equity History September 2nd 2022

A Look At COSCO SHIPPING Ports' Liabilities

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that COSCO SHIPPING Ports had liabilities of US$1.57b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$3.31b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$1.10b in cash and US$342.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$3.43b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

The deficiency here weighs heavily on the US$2.19b company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. At the end of the day, COSCO SHIPPING Ports would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

COSCO SHIPPING Ports's debt is 4.6 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 2.6 times over. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. The good news is that COSCO SHIPPING Ports grew its EBIT a smooth 40% over the last twelve months. Like the milk of human kindness that sort of growth increases resilience, making the company more capable of managing debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if COSCO SHIPPING Ports can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. In the last three years, COSCO SHIPPING Ports's free cash flow amounted to 46% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

Our View

We'd go so far as to say COSCO SHIPPING Ports's level of total liabilities was disappointing. But at least it's pretty decent at growing its EBIT; that's encouraging. We should also note that Infrastructure industry companies like COSCO SHIPPING Ports commonly do use debt without problems. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making COSCO SHIPPING Ports stock a bit risky. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but we'd generally feel more comfortable with less leverage. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with COSCO SHIPPING Ports .

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.