Is SKAKO A/S’s (CPH:SKAKO) 16% ROCE Any Good?

Today we'll evaluate SKAKO A/S (CPH:SKAKO) to determine whether it could have potential as an investment idea. In particular, we'll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), as that can give us insight into how profitably the company is able to employ capital in its business.

First up, we'll look at what ROCE is and how we calculate it. Next, we'll compare it to others in its industry. And finally, we'll look at how its current liabilities are impacting its ROCE.

Advertisement

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What is it?

ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. In general, businesses with a higher ROCE are usually better quality. Overall, it is a valuable metric that has its flaws. Author Edwin Whiting says to be careful when comparing the ROCE of different businesses, since 'No two businesses are exactly alike.

So, How Do We Calculate ROCE?

Analysts use this formula to calculate return on capital employed:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

Or for SKAKO:

0.16 = ø20m ÷ (ø258m - ø134m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2019.)

Therefore, SKAKO has an ROCE of 16%.

See our latest analysis for SKAKO

Is SKAKO's ROCE Good?

ROCE can be useful when making comparisons, such as between similar companies. In our analysis, SKAKO's ROCE is meaningfully higher than the 11% average in the Machinery industry. We would consider this a positive, as it suggests it is using capital more effectively than other similar companies. Regardless of where SKAKO sits next to its industry, its ROCE in absolute terms appears satisfactory, and this company could be worth a closer look.

You can see in the image below how SKAKO's ROCE compares to its industry. Click to see more on past growth.

CPSE:SKAKO Past Revenue and Net Income, February 10th 2020
CPSE:SKAKO Past Revenue and Net Income, February 10th 2020

When considering this metric, keep in mind that it is backwards looking, and not necessarily predictive. ROCE can be misleading for companies in cyclical industries, with returns looking impressive during the boom times, but very weak during the busts. ROCE is, after all, simply a snap shot of a single year. You can check if SKAKO has cyclical profits by looking at this free graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

What Are Current Liabilities, And How Do They Affect SKAKO's ROCE?

Short term (or current) liabilities, are things like supplier invoices, overdrafts, or tax bills that need to be paid within 12 months. The ROCE equation subtracts current liabilities from capital employed, so a company with a lot of current liabilities appears to have less capital employed, and a higher ROCE than otherwise. To check the impact of this, we calculate if a company has high current liabilities relative to its total assets.

SKAKO has current liabilities of ø134m and total assets of ø258m. As a result, its current liabilities are equal to approximately 52% of its total assets. SKAKO's current liabilities are fairly high, which increases its ROCE significantly.

What We Can Learn From SKAKO's ROCE

The ROCE would not look as appealing if the company had fewer current liabilities. SKAKO shapes up well under this analysis, but it is far from the only business delivering excellent numbers . You might also want to check this free collection of companies delivering excellent earnings growth.

For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

mitchell_lawler

Micron (MU) is booming, and it still doesn't look ‘expensive’ based on next year's earnings. So why does our own valuation say it could be worth 40% less?

99
zoe_vi5fn

A low price to earnings ratio at the top of the cycle is a warning rather than a bargain, and a terrifyingly high one at the bottom is often the entry point

darius_xnnrd

Memory used to have a dozen participants racing each other into oversupply, and now it has three. High bandwidth memory is qualified into customer designs years ahead, sold under long-term agreements, and is far harder to switch away from than commodity DRAM.

About CPSE:3NOV25

Investeringsselskabet af 3. November 2025

Investeringsselskabet af 3. november 2025 A/S designs, develops, and sells vibratory feeding, conveying, and screening equipment in Europe, the United States of America, Africa, and internationally.

Flawless balance sheet with moderate risk.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

RI
Rick_Orford
FJET logo
Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

Fair Value:US$519.8% undervalued
22 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative
FU
FundamentalFlow
VRT logo
FundamentalFlow on Vertiv Holdings Co ·

The Short and Long Term Compounder of Liquid Cooling industry.

Fair Value:US$45036.2% undervalued
52 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
13 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
SPXC logo
John_Eric on SPX Technologies ·

I Fell in Love With a Data-Center Cooling Stock. Then I Opened the Filings.

Fair Value:US$2034.5% overvalued
20 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
GQG logo
tripledub on GQG Partners ·

The Cheap Genius Problem

Fair Value:AU$3.2155.0% undervalued
30 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
21 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

ON
LOT logo
Ontological on Lotus Technology ·

Lotus Tech, Finloop and FOMO Pay Collaborate to Explore Vehicle Tokenization

Fair Value:US$2.460.4% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
DP
DP_invest
BWLPG logo
DP_invest on BWG ·

High rates continues for Q4 '26 - Q1 '27

Fair Value:NOK 2359.4% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AG
Agricola
SRL logo
Agricola on Salazar Resources ·

A Case for Salazar Resources to reach CAD $2.50 - $7.50+ by 2030

Fair Value:CA$7.594.7% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28019.5% undervalued
306 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9118.3% overvalued
164 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0944.2% undervalued
186 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative