Is Otelco Inc.'s (NASDAQ:OTEL) ROE Of 58% Impressive?

    One of the best investments we can make is in our own knowledge and skill set. With that in mind, this article will work through how we can use Return On Equity (ROE) to better understand a business. We'll use ROE to examine Otelco Inc. (NASDAQ:OTEL), by way of a worked example.

    Otelco has a ROE of 58%, based on the last twelve months. That means that for every $1 worth of shareholders' equity, it generated $0.58 in profit.

    See our latest analysis for Otelco

    Advertisement

    How Do You Calculate ROE?

    The formula for return on equity is:

    Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders' Equity

    Or for Otelco:

    58% = US$8.6m ÷ US$15m (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2019.)

    Most readers would understand what net profit is, but it’s worth explaining the concept of shareholders’ equity. It is the capital paid in by shareholders, plus any retained earnings. Shareholders' equity can be calculated by subtracting the total liabilities of the company from the total assets of the company.

    What Does ROE Mean?

    Return on Equity measures a company's profitability against the profit it has kept for the business (plus any capital injections). The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. That means that the higher the ROE, the more profitable the company is. So, as a general rule, a high ROE is a good thing. That means it can be interesting to compare the ROE of different companies.

    Does Otelco Have A Good ROE?

    Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. As you can see in the graphic below, Otelco has a higher ROE than the average (11%) in the Telecom industry.

    NasdaqCM:OTEL Past Revenue and Net Income, August 26th 2019
    NasdaqCM:OTEL Past Revenue and Net Income, August 26th 2019

    That's what I like to see. I usually take a closer look when a company has a better ROE than industry peers. For example you might check if insiders are buying shares.

    The Importance Of Debt To Return On Equity

    Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the first two cases, the ROE will capture this use of capital to grow. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.

    Otelco's Debt And Its 58% ROE

    It appears that Otelco makes extensive use of debt to improve its returns, because it has a relatively high debt to equity ratio of 4.79. So although the company has an impressive ROE, that figure would be a lot lower without the use of debt.

    The Key Takeaway

    Return on equity is one way we can compare the business quality of different companies. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.

    But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. You can see how the company has grow in the past by looking at this FREE detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

    Of course Otelco may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have high ROE and low debt.

    We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

    If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.

    mitchell_lawler

    People are still arguing about whether Nvidia's chips are the fastest. What if Jensen just built a moat that has nothing to do with the chips?

    1114
    PowerLaw

    I wonder why Jensen is doing this. It just increases the risks of failure multifold.

    zoe_vi5fn

    The bearishness in threads like this is itself worth examining. Every large financing innovation has been called a bubble structure at inception, including securitisation of aircraft, of shipping, of fibre and of mortgages, and three of those four turned out to be genuinely useful market infrastructure that lowered the cost of capital for real assets. The failure case gets remembered because it was spectacular.

    Advertisement

    Weekly Picks

    RI
    Rick_Orford
    FJET logo
    Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

    The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

    Fair Value:US$519.8% undervalued
    22 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    3 users have liked this narrative
    FU
    FundamentalFlow
    VRT logo
    FundamentalFlow on Vertiv Holdings Co ·

    The Short and Long Term Compounder of Liquid Cooling industry.

    Fair Value:US$45036.2% undervalued
    47 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    13 users have liked this narrative
    JO
    John_Eric
    SPXC logo
    John_Eric on SPX Technologies ·

    I Fell in Love With a Data-Center Cooling Stock. Then I Opened the Filings.

    Fair Value:US$2034.5% overvalued
    20 users have followed this narrative
    2 users have commented on this narrative
    4 users have liked this narrative
    TR
    tripledub
    GQG logo
    tripledub on GQG Partners ·

    The Cheap Genius Problem

    Fair Value:AU$3.2155.5% undervalued
    30 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    21 users have liked this narrative

    Updated Narratives

    RO
    RockeTeller
    DSV logo
    RockeTeller on Discovery Mining ·

    #1 Silver Play with Positive Cashflow Gold Miner (Top Notch Team)

    Fair Value:CA$7084.1% undervalued
    61 users have followed this narrative
    16 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    ZO
    NDAQ logo
    zonedinout on Nasdaq ·

    Nasdaq revenue will grow by 7.17% while profit margin surges to 35%

    Fair Value:US$104.196.3% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    MR
    MRT23
    FISV logo
    MRT23 on Fiserv ·

    Q1 2026 FCF collapse has reset the debate from "fair value" to "distressed transformation"

    Fair Value:US$5011.0% overvalued
    5 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative

    Popular Narratives

    OS
    oscargarcia
    NVDA logo
    oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

    The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

    Fair Value:US$28019.5% undervalued
    307 users have followed this narrative
    9 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative
    CU
    MSFT logo
    CubanEros on Microsoft ·

    A wonderful business at reasonable price.

    Fair Value:US$419.9118.3% overvalued
    165 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    8 users have liked this narrative
    KI
    AMZN logo
    KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

    Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

    Fair Value:US$475.0944.2% undervalued
    185 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    8 users have liked this narrative