Does ILPRA (BIT:ILP) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that ILPRA S.p.A. (BIT:ILP) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

Advertisement

When Is Debt A Problem?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for ILPRA

What Is ILPRA's Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that ILPRA had debt of €7.16m at the end of June 2019, a reduction from €8.12m over a year. However, it also had €4.03m in cash, and so its net debt is €3.13m.

BIT:ILP Historical Debt June 9th 2020
BIT:ILP Historical Debt June 9th 2020

How Healthy Is ILPRA's Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that ILPRA had liabilities of €17.3m due within a year, and liabilities of €5.79m falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of €4.03m and €9.99m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling €9.10m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

This deficit isn't so bad because ILPRA is worth €24.8m, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

ILPRA has a low debt to EBITDA ratio of only 1.4. But the really cool thing is that it actually managed to receive more interest than it paid, over the last year. So it's fair to say it can handle debt like a hotshot teppanyaki chef handles cooking. The modesty of its debt load may become crucial for ILPRA if management cannot prevent a repeat of the 20% cut to EBIT over the last year. When it comes to paying off debt, falling earnings are no more useful than sugary sodas are for your health. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine ILPRA's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, ILPRA recorded negative free cash flow, in total. Debt is far more risky for companies with unreliable free cash flow, so shareholders should be hoping that the past expenditure will produce free cash flow in the future.

Our View

On the face of it, ILPRA's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow left us tentative about the stock, and its EBIT growth rate was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But on the bright side, its interest cover is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making ILPRA stock a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should learn about the 5 warning signs we've spotted with ILPRA (including 2 which is shouldn't be ignored) .

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

Love or hate this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.

MI
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

Gold miners still look inexpensive because the market thinks we're near the top of the cycle. Given what's happening to the dollar, I'm not so sure.

Gold miners still look inexpensive because the market thinks we're near the top of the cycle. Given what's happening to the dollar, I'm not so sure. cover
1617
ST
steve_investor

Is it a safer bet on gold to have just exposure to ETFs?

MA
marcus_l38oa

Between 2003 and 2011, gold nearly went 5x. Dollar went weak too. The gold companies did bad. It is worth noting that between 2003 and 2011, there was 2008! I will leave it your inference and research.

About BIT:ILP

ILPRA

Engages in the design, production, and sale of packaging machines worldwide.

Undervalued with high growth potential.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

RI
Rick_Orford
FJET logo
Rick_Orford on Starfighters Space ·

The 1960s Fighter Jet That Could Crack Open a $20 Billion Satellite Market

Fair Value:US$522.0% undervalued
61 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
MELI logo
John_Eric on MercadoLibre ·

MercadoLibre and the Spreadsheet Trick That Decides Everything

Fair Value:US$7.31k73.7% undervalued
111 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative
RC
PYPL logo
rcb9 on PayPal Holdings ·

Ten Percent More Volume, One Percent More Transaction Margin

Fair Value:US$70.8913.2% undervalued
16 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
HE
HedgeY
MU logo
HedgeY on Micron Technology ·

Micron - The Memory Bottleneck Behind the AI Supercycle

Fair Value:US$1.25k22.7% undervalued
44 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

AN
andre_santos
MCD logo
andre_santos on McDonald's ·

McDonald's - A Fundamental Valuation

Fair Value:US$233.6716.0% overvalued
38 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
OL
ETN logo
OLetourneau on Eaton ·

Electrical Infrastructure Rail

Fair Value:US$37711.2% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AN
andrei9868
LOW logo
andrei9868 on Lowe's Companies ·

Digital Tools and Acquisitions Will Capture Underserved Pro Markets

Fair Value:US$25515.3% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28023.3% undervalued
343 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9115.1% overvalued
190 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0945.6% undervalued
219 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

HA
HarishPK
EVER logo
HarishPK on EverQuote ·

Feedback welcome!

3
|
0
MA
MRNA logo
Madave on Moderna ·

Aged like wine

2
|
0