Here's Why CSX (NASDAQ:CSX) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies CSX Corporation (NASDAQ:CSX) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

Advertisement

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

What Is CSX's Net Debt?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that CSX had US$19.3b in debt in September 2025; about the same as the year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$618.0m, its net debt is less, at about US$18.7b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
NasdaqGS:CSX Debt to Equity History January 4th 2026

How Healthy Is CSX's Balance Sheet?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that CSX had liabilities of US$2.97b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$27.6b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$618.0m as well as receivables valued at US$1.37b due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$28.5b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since CSX has a huge market capitalization of US$67.5b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

View our latest analysis for CSX

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

CSX's debt is 2.9 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 6.4 times over. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Unfortunately, CSX's EBIT flopped 12% over the last four quarters. If that sort of decline is not arrested, then the managing its debt will be harder than selling broccoli flavoured ice-cream for a premium. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if CSX can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, CSX's free cash flow amounted to 48% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

Our View

CSX's struggle to grow its EBIT had us second guessing its balance sheet strength, but the other data-points we considered were relatively redeeming. But on the bright side, its ability to to cover its interest expense with its EBIT isn't too shabby at all. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that CSX is taking some risks with its use of debt. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for CSX you should be aware of.

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About NasdaqGS:CSX

CSX

Provides rail-based freight transportation services in the United States and Canada.

Average dividend payer with limited growth.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

LO
Lou_Basenese
OPTH logo
Lou_Basenese on Optimi Health ·

The Only Psychedelic Company Already Selling MDMA and Psilocybin to Real Patients, Yet Priced Like It Doesn’t Exist

Fair Value:US$1158.7% undervalued
32 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
WE
WealthAP
NOVO B logo
WealthAP on Novo Nordisk ·

Novo Nordisk (NVO): Is the "Easy Growth" Story Over?

Fair Value:DKK 407.7721.6% undervalued
48 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
VA
ValueInvestingSubstack
ZTS logo
ValueInvestingSubstack on Zoetis ·

Zoetis down -50% over the past year

Fair Value:US$92.9220.2% undervalued
14 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
CE
CentryResearch
LEU logo
CentryResearch on Centrus Energy ·

Centrus Energy: The Next Nuclear Bottleneck Isn't Reactors. It's Fuel.

Fair Value:US$1908.3% undervalued
11 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

JO
John_Eric
NOW logo
John_Eric on ServiceNow ·

The Company Nobody Brags About

Fair Value:US$266.0164.1% undervalued
29 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnimalDoctorKwon
A176750 logo
AnimalDoctorKwon on DuChemBIOLtd ·

DuChemBio absorbs Radio DNS Labs as Novartis injects 140B KRW into Korean RLT. With 100%+ OCF/EBITDA, the 6-mo lag is a de-risked steal.

Fair Value:₩10k43.5% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AL
NOW logo
Alice3D on ServiceNow ·

NOW is an established SAAS positioned for accelerated growth over the next 5 years.

Fair Value:US$15538.4% undervalued
23 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

IN
Investingwilly
MA logo
Investingwilly on Mastercard ·

Mastercard: The Best Dividend Stock You're Ignoring

Fair Value:US$75029.1% undervalued
101 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
BE
PYPL logo
benjamin_lvieq on PayPal Holdings ·

PayPal: PayPal Doesn't Need to Grow – It Needs to Stop Falling – A Mispriced Cash Machine With a Cannibal Buyback

Fair Value:US$6514.6% undervalued
69 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
10 users have liked this narrative
BL
BlackGoat
CBRS logo
BlackGoat on Cerebras Systems ·

The Wafer Giant Threatening NVIDIA's GPU Hegemony

Fair Value:US$415.5449.5% undervalued
64 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

ST
StoxEurope
AD logo
StoxEurope on Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize ·

I ran Ahold Delhaize through a three-model triangulation — DCF, dividend discount, and residual income — with every assumption published and tagged as fact or assumption. The interesting result isn't a number, it's a disagreement: the point estimates run from €20,03 (RIM) through €27,64 (DDM) to €64,91 (DCF), and the pairwise overlaps form two disjoint segments — €20,36–€21,54 and €39,60–€44,56. Between €21,54 and €39,60, no two of the three models agree. [img]https://staticm.fastcomments.com/1784197249786-1000x1000-ad-range-strip.png[/img] Most of the spread is lens properties rather than company drama. A dividend model structurally can't see the roughly half of shareholder returns Ahold pays through buybacks. The book is ~96 % goodwill from the 2016 merger, which pins the residual-income reading low. And ~83 % of the DCF's value sits beyond the explicit five years, so it leans hard on the terminal assumptions. Three honest lenses, three honest answers — the disagreement is the information. Disclosures Position disclosure: The author holds no position in Ahold Delhaize as at 9 July 2026. This valuation is a StoxEurope opinion, based on honest research. Mistakes are possible. This is not investment advice. Do your own research. This article demonstrates a valuation methodology. It is not an investment recommendation, is not personalised to any reader's circumstances, and every figure in it depends entirely on the stated assumptions

1
|
0