Why You Should Like ePlus inc.’s (NASDAQ:PLUS) ROCE

Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and you could win a $250 gift card!

Today we are going to look at ePlus inc. (NASDAQ:PLUS) to see whether it might be an attractive investment prospect. Specifically, we'll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), since that will give us an insight into how efficiently the business can generate profits from the capital it requires.

First, we'll go over how we calculate ROCE. Next, we'll compare it to others in its industry. Then we'll determine how its current liabilities are affecting its ROCE.

Advertisement

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What is it?

ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. All else being equal, a better business will have a higher ROCE. Overall, it is a valuable metric that has its flaws. Author Edwin Whiting says to be careful when comparing the ROCE of different businesses, since 'No two businesses are exactly alike.'

So, How Do We Calculate ROCE?

Analysts use this formula to calculate return on capital employed:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

Or for ePlus:

0.18 = US$81m ÷ (US$786m - US$329m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2019.)

Therefore, ePlus has an ROCE of 18%.

Check out our latest analysis for ePlus

Is ePlus's ROCE Good?

ROCE is commonly used for comparing the performance of similar businesses. In our analysis, ePlus's ROCE is meaningfully higher than the 12% average in the Electronic industry. I think that's good to see, since it implies the company is better than other companies at making the most of its capital. Regardless of where ePlus sits next to its industry, its ROCE in absolute terms appears satisfactory, and this company could be worth a closer look.

NasdaqGS:PLUS Past Revenue and Net Income, June 20th 2019
NasdaqGS:PLUS Past Revenue and Net Income, June 20th 2019

When considering ROCE, bear in mind that it reflects the past and does not necessarily predict the future. ROCE can be deceptive for cyclical businesses, as returns can look incredible in boom times, and terribly low in downturns. ROCE is, after all, simply a snap shot of a single year. Since the future is so important for investors, you should check out our free report on analyst forecasts for ePlus.

Do ePlus's Current Liabilities Skew Its ROCE?

Current liabilities include invoices, such as supplier payments, short-term debt, or a tax bill, that need to be paid within 12 months. The ROCE equation subtracts current liabilities from capital employed, so a company with a lot of current liabilities appears to have less capital employed, and a higher ROCE than otherwise. To check the impact of this, we calculate if a company has high current liabilities relative to its total assets.

ePlus has total assets of US$786m and current liabilities of US$329m. Therefore its current liabilities are equivalent to approximately 42% of its total assets. ePlus has a middling amount of current liabilities, increasing its ROCE somewhat.

Our Take On ePlus's ROCE

With a decent ROCE, the company could be interesting, but remember that the level of current liabilities make the ROCE look better. ePlus shapes up well under this analysis, but it is far from the only business delivering excellent numbers . You might also want to check this free collection of companies delivering excellent earnings growth.

For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.

MI
mitchell_lawler
mitchell_lawler

A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it. cover
1910
ZO
zoe_vi5fn

Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.

CO
connor_iwn1g

Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.

Andrew Legget

Great earnings season, but are the earnings real?

Great earnings season, but are the earnings real? cover
At first glance, this was the strongest earnings season in years. But when you look at where the growth actually came from, the story splits into two very different pictures.
20

About NasdaqGS:PLUS

ePlus

Provides information technology (IT) solutions that enable organizations to optimize IT environment and supply chain processes in the United States and internationally.

Flawless balance sheet with solid track record.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

LO
Lou_Basenese
ONCY logo
Lou_Basenese on Oncolytics Biotech ·

The Team Behind a $2 Billion Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Deal Just Took Over This $105 Million Cancer Biotech

Fair Value:US$3.575.5% undervalued
40 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
Recommended Voice
META logo
tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

Fair Value:US$5861.4% undervalued
62 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
34 users have liked this narrative
TA
Talos
Emerging Author
VOYG logo
Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

Fair Value:US$385.291.1% undervalued
68 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
IV
Emerging Author
UBER logo
Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

Fair Value:US$11632.1% undervalued
14 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

KE
EPICON logo
ketchup2121 on Epicon Berhad ·

From Contractor to Larger Construction Platform: Epicon's Next Phase Is Taking Shape

Fair Value:RM 0.5158.8% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AN
EPICON logo
Anthony_Lee on Epicon Berhad ·

Epicon's Q2 Recovery Shows Better Earnings Quality, With Bigger Catalysts Ahead

Fair Value:RM 0.5158.8% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
VST logo
John_Eric on Vistra ·

Vistra Fell 38%. Adjusted EBITDA Rose 31%. Here's the $472 Million Reason They Disagree.

Fair Value:US$291.8753.0% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
363 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9122.3% overvalued
211 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
Emerging Author
MELI logo
John_Eric on MercadoLibre ·

MercadoLibre and the Spreadsheet Trick That Decides Everything

Fair Value:US$7.31k73.1% undervalued
125 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative