Advertisement
- United States
- /
- Retail Distributors
- /
- NasdaqGM:EDUC
Educational Development Corporation's (NASDAQ:EDUC) Stock's On An Uptrend: Are Strong Financials Guiding The Market?
Most readers would already be aware that Educational Development's (NASDAQ:EDUC) stock increased significantly by 15% over the past month. Given the company's impressive performance, we decided to study its financial indicators more closely as a company's financial health over the long-term usually dictates market outcomes. Specifically, we decided to study Educational Development's ROE in this article.
ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.
View our latest analysis for Educational Development
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
ROE can be calculated by using the formula:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Educational Development is:
28% = US$11m ÷ US$39m (Based on the trailing twelve months to November 2020).
The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.28 in profit.
What Is The Relationship Between ROE And Earnings Growth?
Thus far, we have learned that ROE measures how efficiently a company is generating its profits. Depending on how much of these profits the company reinvests or "retains", and how effectively it does so, we are then able to assess a company’s earnings growth potential. Assuming everything else remains unchanged, the higher the ROE and profit retention, the higher the growth rate of a company compared to companies that don't necessarily bear these characteristics.
Educational Development's Earnings Growth And 28% ROE
First thing first, we like that Educational Development has an impressive ROE. Further, even comparing with the industry average if 31%, the company's ROE is quite respectable. As a result, Educational Development's remarkable 27% net income growth seen over the past 5 years is likely aided by its high ROE.
As a next step, we compared Educational Development's net income growth with the industry, and pleasingly, we found that the growth seen by the company is higher than the average industry growth of 15%.
Earnings growth is a huge factor in stock valuation. The investor should try to establish if the expected growth or decline in earnings, whichever the case may be, is priced in. By doing so, they will have an idea if the stock is headed into clear blue waters or if swampy waters await. Is Educational Development fairly valued compared to other companies? These 3 valuation measures might help you decide.
Is Educational Development Using Its Retained Earnings Effectively?
Educational Development's ' three-year median payout ratio is on the lower side at 23% implying that it is retaining a higher percentage (77%) of its profits. This suggests that the management is reinvesting most of the profits to grow the business as evidenced by the growth seen by the company.
Besides, Educational Development has been paying dividends for at least ten years or more. This shows that the company is committed to sharing profits with its shareholders.
Conclusion
In total, we are pretty happy with Educational Development's performance. Specifically, we like that the company is reinvesting a huge chunk of its profits at a high rate of return. This of course has caused the company to see substantial growth in its earnings. If the company continues to grow its earnings the way it has, that could have a positive impact on its share price given how earnings per share influence long-term share prices. Not to forget, share price outcomes are also dependent on the potential risks a company may face. So it is important for investors to be aware of the risks involved in the business. Our risks dashboard will have the 1 risk we have identified for Educational Development.
If you’re looking to trade Educational Development, open an account with the lowest-cost* platform trusted by professionals, Interactive Brokers. Their clients from over 200 countries and territories trade stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds worldwide from a single integrated account. Promoted
Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.
Discover if Educational Development might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.
Access Free AnalysisThis article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
*Interactive Brokers Rated Lowest Cost Broker by StockBrokers.com Annual Online Review 2020
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
M
The Foxhole
Three rival AI bosses just backed slowing AI down for safety. But who would a slowdown actually protect?
55
Andrew LeggetMarket Insights
Are social media stocks the new Big Tobacco?
Greater regulatory scrutiny is catching up with digital platforms, posing a rising risk for social media stocks. But as Big Tobacco discovered, that's not always a bad outcome for shareholders.
14
About NasdaqGM:EDUC
Educational Development
Distributes children's books, educational toys and games, and related products in the United States.
Flawless balance sheet with low risk.
Similar Companies
Market Insights
Advertisement
Weekly Picks
CE
Ceazar on Sparc AI ·
When GPS fails: this small cap is fixing a $54B drone problem
Fair Value:CA$5.2541.0% undervalued
192 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
29 likesusers have liked this narrative
WE
WealthAP on Copart ·
Copart’s Share Price Fell. Its Moat Did Not.
Fair Value:US$4938.9% undervalued
42 followersusers have followed this narrative
2 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
13 likesusers have liked this narrative
IV
Ivoed on ASML Holding ·
ASML’s China Sell-Off Looks Overdone, Yet The Shares Are Not Cheap
Fair Value:€1.78k22.0% undervalued
32 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
8 likesusers have liked this narrative
FU
FundamentalContrarianInvestor on Universal Music Group ·
Universal Music Group: The Market Is Pricing the Quarter, Not the Catalogue
Fair Value:€23.2536.4% undervalued
11 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
3 likesusers have liked this narrative
Recently Updated Narratives
WO
woodworthfund on Willamette Valley Vineyards ·
Willamette Valley Vineyards (WVVI): Not-So-Great Value
Fair Value:US$0.2951.7% overvalued
14 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
0 likesusers have liked this narrative
BR
Brunhilde_Wagner on Copart ·
Compounder to Cash Generator in Real Time
Fair Value:US$2519.8% overvalued
2 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
0 likesusers have liked this narrative
LU
LunaRodas on Coda Octopus Group ·
CODA | Coda Octopus Group, Inc.: What They Said vs. What They Did
Fair Value:US$16.3238.6% undervalued
1 followerusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
0 likesusers have liked this narrative
Popular Narratives
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget on NVIDIA ·
NVDA: Expanding AI Demand Will Drive Major Data Center Investments Through 2026
Fair Value:US$302.8327.9% undervalued
1440 followersusers have followed this narrative
8 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
35 likesusers have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget on Alphabet ·
GOOGL: AI Platform Expansion And Cloud Demand Will Support Durable Performance Amid Competitive Pressures
Fair Value:US$427.8920.9% undervalued
1624 followersusers have followed this narrative
0 commentsusers have commented on this narrative
19 likesusers have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget on Amazon.com ·
AMZN: Acceleration In Cloud And AI Will Drive Margin Expansion Ahead
Fair Value:US$32721.5% undervalued
1641 followersusers have followed this narrative
1 commentusers have commented on this narrative
16 likesusers have liked this narrative
Trending Discussion
AN
anthony_x0j2w on Platform Group SE KGaA ·
Hello,(I am a shareholder).I spent the summer investigating in whatever I was able to find in the press, the trustee, or legal, and comparing it to FS Benner's declaration/transcripts:press: MM has a tendancy to use facts, modify them and turn them the way they want: 100% of their claims against TPG0 is traçable factually, 80% is flawed and interpreted. Example are numerous: 11M loans banks to be paid seems right, but it has not been an issue at all, it has been paid in full. (and it happens all the time in every business...); the previous HR becoming a financial director in the article herself being attacked by TPG on the legal side; the wrong address of curator (if truly announced by TPG).Trustee: according to my research (which can be incomplete) no communication to the Nordic trustee (hereby, bond holders) has been done on a, indebtedness (late payment) > 1M€, which is their obligation by contract (clause 14.d - https://corporate.the-platform-group.com/bond/) => this is a sign of a huge lie and fraud, or the sign that there is no indebtedness > 1M€ over the whole TPG group.Legal: still awaiting for an answer, probable that I won't get it.VALUATIONYou can spent hours working the fundamentals, if they're flawed...the thesis falls.Anyway, I always substracts the badwill (that I consider non-current - you have it in the CFS) & non-controlling interests from my valuation:Earnings ~22MFCF ~40M€The financial statements are not the issue here, we are more on an cheap option on the sincerity of the accounts that a real valuation. Unfortunately, these are unverifiable elements, hence the low price./!\ Careful:the accounts are consolidated and skip the subsidiaries issues...Careful with the business model: TPG0 is a financial holding that acquire subsidiaries, hold the debt, and has no operations. 100% of the Cash Flow comes from subs' dividends => it is a risk here, more a plumber risk than an operational one, but nevertheless...The auditor is too small, and managed by the same firm than before, with 140K€/year commission => it's too low, nobody external really reviewed what Benner and his team are doing internallycapital increase do not go through the CFS, but through change in equity AND equity in the BSIf the equity stays low too long, the WACC increase will be unbearable (I have a 30% global, with a 118% on equity): diluting is expensive => TPG machine can stay broken for a while.Most of the people I talk with never saw this, while this is ESSENTIAL to Benner's business model.SEVERAL EVENTS THAT COULD CHANGE:AEP is being audited by KPMG: if Benner plays the "we will propose KPMG to our shareholders BEOY", this can increase the trust in him significantly/KPMG (or other) to validate the 2026 IFRS accounts & having a word on HGB's: though still consolidated, at least we'll know...AEP being eventually acquired: while it carries a high integration risk due to its size, they talked about it so many times, that trust goes with it.Without this combination of event, the equity is doomed to stay at this level, IMO.Do not forget to also follow the bond: with TPG's announced safe harbor plan for buyback (25% of daily exchange), it is also interesting to check this illiquid and retail market: https://live.deutsche-boerse.com/bond/no0013256834-the-platform-group-ag-8-875-24-28?mic=XFRA
1
|0
CO
Constantin_Mar on Platform Group SE KGaA ·
Quite a lot of speculation presented as if it were evidence.You are combining alleged payment disputes, alleged bank actions, legal disputes with journalists and other unverified claims to imply that TPG’s financial reporting is somehow unreliable or that the company is approaching insolvency. That’s a very serious conclusion, but the evidence you’ve presented doesn’t establish it.TPG’s financial statements, share count, debt, cash flow and acquisitions can all be checked against official filings and corporate documents. That’s called due diligence. Repeating allegations and then pointing to a low P/E doesn’t prove anything.In fact, the P/E below 1 is precisely the reason the underlying numbers need to be investigated rather than dismissed. If you have documentary evidence that TPG’s reported figures are false, that banks actually cancelled the alleged facilities, or that the company is insolvent, publish the documents and numbers.Otherwise, this reads less like analysis and more like an attempt to create fear and selling pressure around a micro-cap stock.Claims require evidence. Allegations are not evidence.
1
|1
