Here's Why Chart Industries (NYSE:GTLS) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Chart Industries, Inc. (NYSE:GTLS) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

Advertisement

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

How Much Debt Does Chart Industries Carry?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Chart Industries had debt of US$3.64b at the end of December 2024, a reduction from US$3.83b over a year. However, it does have US$308.6m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$3.33b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:GTLS Debt to Equity History April 21st 2025

A Look At Chart Industries' Liabilities

The latest balance sheet data shows that Chart Industries had liabilities of US$1.79b due within a year, and liabilities of US$4.34b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$308.6m in cash and US$1.50b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$4.32b.

This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of US$5.77b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Chart Industries' use of debt. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.

View our latest analysis for Chart Industries

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

While Chart Industries's debt to EBITDA ratio (3.6) suggests that it uses some debt, its interest cover is very weak, at 2.0, suggesting high leverage. So shareholders should probably be aware that interest expenses appear to have really impacted the business lately. Looking on the bright side, Chart Industries boosted its EBIT by a silky 63% in the last year. Like the milk of human kindness that sort of growth increases resilience, making the company more capable of managing debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Chart Industries can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Chart Industries recorded free cash flow of 35% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

Our View

Neither Chart Industries's ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT nor its net debt to EBITDA gave us confidence in its ability to take on more debt. But the good news is it seems to be able to grow its EBIT with ease. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that Chart Industries is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. Not all risk is bad, as it can boost share price returns if it pays off, but this debt risk is worth keeping in mind. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Chart Industries you should be aware of.

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About NYSE:GTLS

Chart Industries

Engages in the designing, engineering, and manufacturing of process technologies and equipment for the gas and liquid molecules in the United States and internationally.

Undervalued with moderate growth potential.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

ST
stuart_roberts
UNCY logo
stuart_roberts on Unicycive Therapeutics ·

Looking to be second time lucky with a game-changing new product

Fair Value:US$21.5371.1% undervalued
33 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
HE
PLY logo
HegelBayeBagel on PlaySide Studios ·

PlaySide Studios: Market Is Sleeping on a Potential 10M+ Unit Breakout Year, FY26 Could Be the Rerate of the Decade

Fair Value:AU$0.8463.1% undervalued
9 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnimalDoctorKwon
NOTV logo
AnimalDoctorKwon on Inotiv ·

Inotiv NAMs Test Center

Fair Value:US$1.275.7% undervalued
19 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
TH
CGNT logo
TheValueDetector on Cognyte Software ·

This isn’t speculation — this is confirmation.A Schedule 13G was filed, not a 13D, meaning this is passive institutional capital, not acti

Fair Value:US$95.6792.6% undervalued
24 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

CA
Canderous
TAL logo
Canderous on PetroTal ·

Beyond 2026, Beyond a Double

Fair Value:CA$1.8178.2% undervalued
2 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AG
Agricola
AUMB logo
Agricola on 1911 Gold ·

A case for TSXV:AUMB to reach USD$2.69 (CAD$3.70) by 2030 (15X).

Fair Value:CA$3.774.9% undervalued
19 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
CO
composite32
FRU logo
composite32 on Freehold Royalties ·

Freehold: Offers a fantastic growth-income intersection up to $50 WTI. Below $50 WTI, it may offer historic opportunities in terms of ROI.

Fair Value:CA$19.3811.9% undervalued
6 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

DA
davidlsander
UBI logo
davidlsander on Ubisoft Entertainment ·

Is Ubisoft the Market’s Biggest Pricing Error? Why Forensic Value Points to €33 Per Share

Fair Value:€33.887.4% undervalued
59 users have followed this narrative
5 users have commented on this narrative
25 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
MSFT logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on Microsoft ·

Analyst Commentary Highlights Microsoft AI Momentum and Upward Valuation Amid Growth and Competitive Risks

Fair Value:US$59633.4% undervalued
1279 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
TA
Talos
TSLA logo
Talos on Tesla ·

The "Physical AI" Monopoly – A New Industrial Revolution

Fair Value:US$665.3638.3% undervalued
45 users have followed this narrative
19 users have commented on this narrative
22 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

Advertisement