Stock Analysis

These 4 Measures Indicate That Aerospace Industrial Development (TWSE:2634) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

TWSE:2634
Source: Shutterstock

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies Aerospace Industrial Development Corporation (TWSE:2634) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for Aerospace Industrial Development

What Is Aerospace Industrial Development's Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2023 Aerospace Industrial Development had NT$23.2b of debt, an increase on NT$17.2b, over one year. On the flip side, it has NT$2.83b in cash leading to net debt of about NT$20.4b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
TWSE:2634 Debt to Equity History March 24th 2024

A Look At Aerospace Industrial Development's Liabilities

According to the last reported balance sheet, Aerospace Industrial Development had liabilities of NT$28.4b due within 12 months, and liabilities of NT$6.25b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had NT$2.83b in cash and NT$18.0b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total NT$13.8b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Aerospace Industrial Development has a market capitalization of NT$47.4b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

Strangely Aerospace Industrial Development has a sky high EBITDA ratio of 5.5, implying high debt, but a strong interest coverage of 13.5. This means that unless the company has access to very cheap debt, that interest expense will likely grow in the future. It is well worth noting that Aerospace Industrial Development's EBIT shot up like bamboo after rain, gaining 79% in the last twelve months. That'll make it easier to manage its debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Aerospace Industrial Development can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Aerospace Industrial Development burned a lot of cash. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.

Our View

We weren't impressed with Aerospace Industrial Development's net debt to EBITDA, and its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow made us cautious. But like a ballerina ending on a perfect pirouette, it has not trouble covering its interest expense with its EBIT. When we consider all the factors mentioned above, we do feel a bit cautious about Aerospace Industrial Development's use of debt. While debt does have its upside in higher potential returns, we think shareholders should definitely consider how debt levels might make the stock more risky. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 2 warning signs with Aerospace Industrial Development (at least 1 which is concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

Valuation is complex, but we're helping make it simple.

Find out whether Aerospace Industrial Development is potentially over or undervalued by checking out our comprehensive analysis, which includes fair value estimates, risks and warnings, dividends, insider transactions and financial health.

View the Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.