There are a few key trends to look for if we want to identify the next multi-bagger. Firstly, we'll want to see a proven return on capital employed (ROCE) that is increasing, and secondly, an expanding base of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Although, when we looked at M Food (WSE:MFD), it didn't seem to tick all of these boxes.
What is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. The formula for this calculation on M Food is:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
0.064 = zł6.7m ÷ (zł170m - zł65m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2021).
So, M Food has an ROCE of 6.4%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Food industry average of 8.6%.
View our latest analysis for M Food
While the past is not representative of the future, it can be helpful to know how a company has performed historically, which is why we have this chart above. If you're interested in investigating M Food's past further, check out this free graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
What Does the ROCE Trend For M Food Tell Us?
Things have been pretty stable at M Food, with its capital employed and returns on that capital staying somewhat the same for the last five years. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. With that in mind, unless investment picks up again in the future, we wouldn't expect M Food to be a multi-bagger going forward.
Another point to note, we noticed the company has increased current liabilities over the last five years. This is intriguing because if current liabilities hadn't increased to 38% of total assets, this reported ROCE would probably be less than6.4% because total capital employed would be higher.The 6.4% ROCE could be even lower if current liabilities weren't 38% of total assets, because the the formula would show a larger base of total capital employed. So while current liabilities isn't high right now, keep an eye out in case it increases further, because this can introduce some elements of risk.
The Bottom Line
We can conclude that in regards to M Food's returns on capital employed and the trends, there isn't much change to report on. Since the stock has declined 40% over the last five years, investors may not be too optimistic on this trend improving either. Therefore based on the analysis done in this article, we don't think M Food has the makings of a multi-bagger.
One more thing: We've identified 2 warning signs with M Food (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them would certainly be useful.
For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.
New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place
We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.
• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
About WSE:MFD
Adequate balance sheet low.