Stock Analysis

Landmarks Berhad (KLSE:LANDMRK) Has Debt But No Earnings; Should You Worry?

KLSE:LANDMRK
Source: Shutterstock

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Landmarks Berhad (KLSE:LANDMRK) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

View our latest analysis for Landmarks Berhad

What Is Landmarks Berhad's Debt?

As you can see below, Landmarks Berhad had RM125.9m of debt, at December 2021, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had RM21.0m in cash, and so its net debt is RM104.9m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
KLSE:LANDMRK Debt to Equity History April 7th 2022

A Look At Landmarks Berhad's Liabilities

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Landmarks Berhad had liabilities of RM161.7m due within 12 months and liabilities of RM252.3m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of RM21.0m as well as receivables valued at RM128.8m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling RM264.2m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

When you consider that this deficiency exceeds the company's RM194.7m market capitalization, you might well be inclined to review the balance sheet intently. In the scenario where the company had to clean up its balance sheet quickly, it seems likely shareholders would suffer extensive dilution. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is Landmarks Berhad's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

In the last year Landmarks Berhad had a loss before interest and tax, and actually shrunk its revenue by 85%, to RM5.6m. That makes us nervous, to say the least.

Caveat Emptor

While Landmarks Berhad's falling revenue is about as heartwarming as a wet blanket, arguably its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss is even less appealing. Its EBIT loss was a whopping RM48m. When we look at that alongside the significant liabilities, we're not particularly confident about the company. It would need to improve its operations quickly for us to be interested in it. Not least because it had negative free cash flow of RM27m over the last twelve months. That means it's on the risky side of things. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Landmarks Berhad you should be aware of, and 1 of them can't be ignored.

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

Valuation is complex, but we're helping make it simple.

Find out whether Landmarks Berhad is potentially over or undervalued by checking out our comprehensive analysis, which includes fair value estimates, risks and warnings, dividends, insider transactions and financial health.

View the Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.