Stock Analysis

Statutory Profit Doesn't Reflect How Good Pacific Systems' (TSE:3847) Earnings Are

Published
TSE:3847

Even though Pacific Systems Corporation's (TSE:3847) recent earnings release was robust, the market didn't seem to notice. We think that investors have missed some encouraging factors underlying the profit figures.

See our latest analysis for Pacific Systems

TSE:3847 Earnings and Revenue History November 20th 2024

A Closer Look At Pacific Systems' Earnings

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

Pacific Systems has an accrual ratio of -0.10 for the year to September 2024. That indicates that its free cash flow was a fair bit more than its statutory profit. To wit, it produced free cash flow of JP¥978m during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of JP¥623.0m. Pacific Systems' free cash flow improved over the last year, which is generally good to see.

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Pacific Systems.

Our Take On Pacific Systems' Profit Performance

Pacific Systems' accrual ratio is solid, and indicates strong free cash flow, as we discussed, above. Because of this, we think Pacific Systems' earnings potential is at least as good as it seems, and maybe even better! And on top of that, its earnings per share have grown at 11% per year over the last three years. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. So if you'd like to dive deeper into this stock, it's crucial to consider any risks it's facing. While conducting our analysis, we found that Pacific Systems has 2 warning signs and it would be unwise to ignore them.

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Pacific Systems' profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.