Is Ascopiave (BIT:ASC) Using Too Much Debt?

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Ascopiave S.p.A. (BIT:ASC) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

Advertisement

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

What Is Ascopiave's Net Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2025 Ascopiave had €621.6m of debt, an increase on €418.2m, over one year. On the flip side, it has €25.0m in cash leading to net debt of about €596.5m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
BIT:ASC Debt to Equity History February 13th 2026

How Strong Is Ascopiave's Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Ascopiave had liabilities of €274.3m due within a year, and liabilities of €584.5m falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of €25.0m as well as receivables valued at €123.1m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling €710.7m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of €778.1m, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Ascopiave's use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

Check out our latest analysis for Ascopiave

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

Ascopiave's net debt is 4.1 times its EBITDA, which is a significant but still reasonable amount of leverage. But its EBIT was about 1k times its interest expense, implying the company isn't really paying a high cost to maintain that level of debt. Even were the low cost to prove unsustainable, that is a good sign. Importantly, Ascopiave grew its EBIT by 35% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Ascopiave can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, Ascopiave recorded negative free cash flow, in total. Debt is far more risky for companies with unreliable free cash flow, so shareholders should be hoping that the past expenditure will produce free cash flow in the future.

Our View

While Ascopiave's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow has us nervous. To wit both its interest cover and EBIT growth rate were encouraging signs. We should also note that Gas Utilities industry companies like Ascopiave commonly do use debt without problems. We think that Ascopiave's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. Not all risk is bad, as it can boost share price returns if it pays off, but this debt risk is worth keeping in mind. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Ascopiave (including 2 which don't sit too well with us) .

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About BIT:ASC

Ascopiave

Engages in the distribution of natural gas in Italy.

Solid track record established dividend payer.

Similar Companies

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

CE
Ceazar
CNXU logo
Ceazar on Conexeu Sciences ·

This small biotech is developing technology that could potentially change how tissue is rebuilt

Fair Value:US$25.3451.9% undervalued
49 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
HE
HedgeY
PWR logo
HedgeY on Quanta Services ·

The Picks-and-Shovels Leader of the Grid Supercycle

Fair Value:US$7104.2% overvalued
52 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
FU
KRMN logo
FundamentalFlow on Karman Holdings ·

KRMN — Karman Space & Defense: Down 58% from Peak, Is the Market Mispricing a Hypergrowth Defense Compounder?

Fair Value:US$105.654.8% undervalued
34 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
DO
Double_Bubbler
IES logo
Double_Bubbler on Invinity Energy Systems ·

Invinity Energy Systems: All About That BESS

Fair Value:UK£161.9% undervalued
40 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

LO
Lou_Basenese
VTIX logo
Lou_Basenese on Virtuix Holdings ·

From a “Shark Tank” Snub to an Air Force “Yes”: Why Virtuix at $3.50 May Be the Market’sMost Mispriced AI Story

Fair Value:US$7.551.2% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
BR
SPCX logo
browser on Space Exploration Technologies ·

SpaceX: A Sober Look at Catalysts, Risks, and Long‑Term Value After the IPO

Fair Value:US$0.4633.5k% overvalued
2 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
RO
RockeTeller
AMQ logo
RockeTeller on Abitibi Metals ·

Abitibi Metals’ High-Grade B26 Polymetallic Deposit Trading at a Fraction of Peers, 96% Undervalued?

Fair Value:CA$1.2949.6% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

MA
martinarauz
NU logo
martinarauz on Nu Holdings ·

Investment Analysis (May 2026)

Fair Value:US$22.7443.8% undervalued
67 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
HA
HarishPK
ADBE logo
HarishPK on Adobe ·

Adobe: A Probabilistic Case for Undervaluation

Fair Value:US$319.9639.1% undervalued
60 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
17 users have liked this narrative
NI
niteco
HON logo
niteco on Honeywell International ·

Honeywell - The Demand-Side of the AI Infrastructure

Fair Value:US$320.1928.8% undervalued
52 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
19 users have liked this narrative