Is Reply (BIT:REY) Using Too Much Debt?

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that Reply S.p.A. (BIT:REY) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality.

When Is Debt A Problem?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

How Much Debt Does Reply Carry?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Reply had debt of €59.8m at the end of June 2025, a reduction from €70.6m over a year. But on the other hand it also has €535.8m in cash, leading to a €476.0m net cash position.

How Strong Is Reply's Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Reply had liabilities of €826.2m due within a year, and liabilities of €284.9m falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of €535.8m as well as receivables valued at €626.9m due within 12 months. So it actually has €51.6m more liquid assets than total liabilities.

Having regard to Reply's size, it seems that its liquid assets are well balanced with its total liabilities. So while it's hard to imagine that the €4.91b company is struggling for cash, we still think it's worth monitoring its balance sheet. Succinctly put, Reply boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!

See our latest analysis for Reply

Another good sign is that Reply has been able to increase its EBIT by 20% in twelve months, making it easier to pay down debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Reply's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. While Reply has net cash on its balance sheet, it's still worth taking a look at its ability to convert earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, to help us understand how quickly it is building (or eroding) that cash balance. During the last three years, Reply produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 73% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

Summing Up

While it is always sensible to investigate a company's debt, in this case Reply has €476.0m in net cash and a decent-looking balance sheet. The cherry on top was that in converted 73% of that EBIT to free cash flow, bringing in €313m. So is Reply's debt a risk? It doesn't seem so to us. Above most other metrics, we think its important to track how fast earnings per share is growing, if at all. If you've also come to that realization, you're in luck, because today you can view this interactive graph of Reply's earnings per share history for free.

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.