We Think Patanjali Foods (NSE:PATANJALI) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Patanjali Foods Limited (NSE:PATANJALI) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
When Is Debt Dangerous?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
See our latest analysis for Patanjali Foods
What Is Patanjali Foods's Debt?
As you can see below, Patanjali Foods had ₹14.5b of debt at March 2023, down from ₹37.0b a year prior. On the flip side, it has ₹11.6b in cash leading to net debt of about ₹2.96b.
How Healthy Is Patanjali Foods' Balance Sheet?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Patanjali Foods had liabilities of ₹32.0b due within 12 months, and liabilities of ₹1.93b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of ₹11.6b and ₹16.0b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling ₹6.41b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
Having regard to Patanjali Foods' size, it seems that its liquid assets are well balanced with its total liabilities. So it's very unlikely that the ₹465.3b company is short on cash, but still worth keeping an eye on the balance sheet. Carrying virtually no net debt, Patanjali Foods has a very light debt load indeed.
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
Patanjali Foods has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.29. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 11.1 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. In fact Patanjali Foods's saving grace is its low debt levels, because its EBIT has tanked 39% in the last twelve months. Falling earnings (if the trend continues) could eventually make even modest debt quite risky. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Patanjali Foods's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the last three years, Patanjali Foods reported free cash flow worth 3.6% of its EBIT, which is really quite low. That limp level of cash conversion undermines its ability to manage and pay down debt.
Our View
Patanjali Foods's struggle to grow its EBIT had us second guessing its balance sheet strength, but the other data-points we considered were relatively redeeming. In particular, its interest cover was re-invigorating. We think that Patanjali Foods's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. Not all risk is bad, as it can boost share price returns if it pays off, but this debt risk is worth keeping in mind. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 2 warning signs with Patanjali Foods , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place
We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.
• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
About NSEI:PATANJALI
Patanjali Foods
Engages in the processing of oil seeds and refining crude oil for edible use in India.
Flawless balance sheet with proven track record.
Similar Companies
Market Insights
Community Narratives
![Unike](https://media.simplywall.st/news/1706674307668-no-image.png)
![Investingwilly](https://media.simplywall.st/news/1706674307668-no-image.png)
![Jonataninho](https://media.simplywall.st/news/1706674307668-no-image.png)