One Software Technologies (TLV:ONE) Has A Rock Solid Balance Sheet

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that One Software Technologies Ltd (TLV:ONE) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

Advertisement

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

Check out the opportunities and risks within the IL IT industry.

What Is One Software Technologies's Debt?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that One Software Technologies had debt of ₪327.7m at the end of June 2022, a reduction from ₪369.2m over a year. However, it also had ₪249.4m in cash, and so its net debt is ₪78.3m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
TASE:ONE Debt to Equity History November 11th 2022

How Strong Is One Software Technologies' Balance Sheet?

According to the last reported balance sheet, One Software Technologies had liabilities of ₪971.6m due within 12 months, and liabilities of ₪357.2m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of ₪249.4m as well as receivables valued at ₪755.6m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling ₪323.8m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

Given One Software Technologies has a market capitalization of ₪3.56b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

One Software Technologies has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.24. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 17.5 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. Also positive, One Software Technologies grew its EBIT by 23% in the last year, and that should make it easier to pay down debt, going forward. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is One Software Technologies's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, One Software Technologies actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.

Our View

One Software Technologies's interest cover suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow is also very heartening. Overall, we don't think One Software Technologies is taking any bad risks, as its debt load seems modest. So the balance sheet looks pretty healthy, to us. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for One Software Technologies that you should be aware of before investing here.

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About TASE:ONE

One Software Technologies

Provides information technology services and solutions worldwide.

Flawless balance sheet with proven track record and pays a dividend.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

DA
davidlsander
OPTH logo
davidlsander on Optimi Health ·

OPTH: A licensed manufacturer already selling MDMA while peers still wait on trials

Fair Value:US$1261.0% undervalued
15 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
2 users have liked this narrative
FU
VRT logo
FundamentalFlow on Vertiv Holdings Co ·

The Short and Long Term Compounder of Liquid Cooling industry.

Fair Value:US$45037.4% undervalued
14 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
SPXC logo
John_Eric on SPX Technologies ·

I Fell in Love With a Data-Center Cooling Stock. Then I Opened the Filings.

Fair Value:US$2036.8% overvalued
7 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
GQG logo
tripledub on GQG Partners ·

The Cheap Genius Problem

Fair Value:AU$2.4540.0% undervalued
17 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
18 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

NE
NeuralAlpha
NVDA logo
NeuralAlpha on NVIDIA ·

NVIDIA: The Indispensable Backbone of the AI Revolution

Fair Value:US$25013.0% undervalued
20 users have followed this narrative
4 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
CO
CSCO logo
CoksiBoy on Cisco Systems ·

AI Workforce Rollout

Fair Value:US$14516.9% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
RO
RockeTeller
AUAU logo
RockeTeller on A2 Gold ·

Nevada Gold Silver Giant: 1.4Moz Gold + 20Moz Silver Potential, Kinross-Backed Nevada Play Exploding?

Fair Value:CA$4.2484.2% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
297 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9120.0% overvalued
159 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0942.7% undervalued
178 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

M0
PONY logo
m00sekateer on Pony AI ·

Checked it. The arithmetic is fine; the inputs aren't, and the conclusion doesn't follow even if they were.1. Fare. $7 is a US robotaxi price. Pony's record peak day in Shenzhen (22 March 2026) was RMB394 net revenue per Gen-7 vehicle on 25 orders — about US$2.20 per order. You're roughly 3x high.2. Utilisation. 25 orders/day is Pony's all-time single-day high, not an average, and you then run it 365 days with zero downtime for charging, cleaning, maintenance, weather or geofence interruption.Corrected, the best day Pony has ever recorded yields ~US$55/day. On $43k of hardware that's ~26 months of gross revenue, before any operating cost. The reported actuals agree: FY2025 robotaxi services revenue US$16.6m on a fleet just past 1,000 units; Q1 2026 US$8.6m with the fleet above 1,700 — call it US$20–25k per vehicle per year against your $63,875.3. The caveat is the whole argument. You flag "not including operational costs (people costs)" and then set it aside. Remote safety operators, platform commissions, charging, insurance, cleaning, depot and maintenance are what determine whether a robotaxi contributes anything at all.4. Payback isn't profitability. Q1 2026: 16.2% gross margin on US$34.3m revenue, US$63.9m of opex, US$53.5m net loss. Marginal hardware payback says nothing about R&D, mapping, licensing or overhead.5. Falling BOM cuts both ways. Pony targets sub-RMB230k (~US$34k) total vehicle cost for 2027. Great for new units, bad for the residual value of fleets already deployed on a five-year depreciation schedule.What you get right: the cost trajectory is real, and city-wide UE breakeven in Guangzhou (Nov 2025) and Shenzhen (Feb 2026) is a genuine milestone. But that is contribution-margin breakeven per trip — not "cracked the per-unit cost," and not an 8-month payback. Your post predates all of it; the data has since landed, and it's less favourable on revenue per vehicle than the model assumed.

0
|
0