Stock Analysis

Is China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group (HKG:1253) Using Too Much Debt?

SEHK:1253
Source: Shutterstock

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group Company Limited (HKG:1253) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

View our latest analysis for China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group

How Much Debt Does China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group Carry?

As you can see below, China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group had CN¥831.9m of debt, at June 2022, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it does have CN¥305.0m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about CN¥526.9m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
SEHK:1253 Debt to Equity History September 9th 2022

How Strong Is China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group's Balance Sheet?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group had liabilities of CN¥2.15b due within 12 months and liabilities of CN¥238.4m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of CN¥305.0m as well as receivables valued at CN¥1.61b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by CN¥468.2m.

This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of CN¥586.6m. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group shareholders face the double whammy of a high net debt to EBITDA ratio (15.2), and fairly weak interest coverage, since EBIT is just 0.60 times the interest expense. This means we'd consider it to have a heavy debt load. Even worse, China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group saw its EBIT tank 34% over the last 12 months. If earnings keep going like that over the long term, it has a snowball's chance in hell of paying off that debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. That sort of strong cash generation warms our hearts like a puppy in a bumblebee suit.

Our View

To be frank both China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group's interest cover and its track record of (not) growing its EBIT make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But at least it's pretty decent at converting EBIT to free cash flow; that's encouraging. Looking at the bigger picture, it seems clear to us that China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group's use of debt is creating risks for the company. If all goes well, that should boost returns, but on the flip side, the risk of permanent capital loss is elevated by the debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for China Greenland Broad Greenstate Group (3 don't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.