We Think Enagás (BME:ENG) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Enagás, S.A. (BME:ENG) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

Advertisement

When Is Debt A Problem?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for Enagás

What Is Enagás's Net Debt?

As you can see below, Enagás had €3.31b of debt at September 2024, down from €4.35b a year prior. However, because it has a cash reserve of €1.27b, its net debt is less, at about €2.04b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
BME:ENG Debt to Equity History January 6th 2025

A Look At Enagás' Liabilities

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Enagás had liabilities of €1.37b falling due within a year, and liabilities of €3.70b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had €1.27b in cash and €282.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling €3.51b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

Given this deficit is actually higher than the company's market capitalization of €3.10b, we think shareholders really should watch Enagás's debt levels, like a parent watching their child ride a bike for the first time. Hypothetically, extremely heavy dilution would be required if the company were forced to pay down its liabilities by raising capital at the current share price.

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

Enagás's debt is 3.8 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 3.5 times over. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. More concerning, Enagás saw its EBIT drop by 3.4% in the last twelve months. If that earnings trend continues the company will face an uphill battle to pay off its debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Enagás's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, Enagás actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.

Our View

Neither Enagás's ability to handle its total liabilities nor its net debt to EBITDA gave us confidence in its ability to take on more debt. But its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow tells a very different story, and suggests some resilience. It's also worth noting that Enagás is in the Gas Utilities industry, which is often considered to be quite defensive. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that Enagás is taking some risks with its use of debt. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Enagás you should be aware of.

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Enagás might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

mitchell_lawler

People are still arguing about whether Nvidia's chips are the fastest. What if Jensen just built a moat that has nothing to do with the chips?

1112
PowerLaw

I wonder why Jensen is doing this. It just increases the risks of failure multifold.

zoe_vi5fn

The bearishness in threads like this is itself worth examining. Every large financing innovation has been called a bubble structure at inception, including securitisation of aircraft, of shipping, of fibre and of mortgages, and three of those four turned out to be genuinely useful market infrastructure that lowered the cost of capital for real assets. The failure case gets remembered because it was spectacular.

About BME:ENG

Enagás

Engages in the transmission, storage, and regasification of natural gas.

Proven track record and fair value.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

DA
davidlsander
OPTH logo
davidlsander on Optimi Health ·

OPTH: A licensed manufacturer already selling MDMA while peers still wait on trials

Fair Value:US$1259.8% undervalued
21 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
2 users have liked this narrative
FU
FundamentalFlow
VRT logo
FundamentalFlow on Vertiv Holdings Co ·

The Short and Long Term Compounder of Liquid Cooling industry.

Fair Value:US$45036.2% undervalued
47 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
13 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
SPXC logo
John_Eric on SPX Technologies ·

I Fell in Love With a Data-Center Cooling Stock. Then I Opened the Filings.

Fair Value:US$2034.5% overvalued
20 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
GQG logo
tripledub on GQG Partners ·

The Cheap Genius Problem

Fair Value:AU$3.2155.5% undervalued
30 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
21 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

ZO
NDAQ logo
zonedinout on Nasdaq ·

Nasdaq revenue will grow by 7.17% while profit margin surges to 35%

Fair Value:US$104.196.3% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
MR
MRT23
FISV logo
MRT23 on Fiserv ·

Q1 2026 FCF collapse has reset the debate from "fair value" to "distressed transformation"

Fair Value:US$5011.0% overvalued
5 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
MR
MRT23
CRMD logo
MRT23 on CorMedix ·

CRMD is trading at 5.9x trough-year EBITDA with the market ascribing near-zero value to two near-term pipeline events

Fair Value:US$1337.4% undervalued
10 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28019.5% undervalued
306 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9118.3% overvalued
164 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0944.2% undervalued
185 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative