Why You Should Like PWR Holdings Limited’s (ASX:PWH) ROCE

Today we are going to look at PWR Holdings Limited (ASX:PWH) to see whether it might be an attractive investment prospect. Specifically, we’ll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), since that will give us an insight into how efficiently the business can generate profits from the capital it requires.

Firstly, we’ll go over how we calculate ROCE. Second, we’ll look at its ROCE compared to similar companies. And finally, we’ll look at how its current liabilities are impacting its ROCE.

What is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

ROCE measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. All else being equal, a better business will have a higher ROCE. In brief, it is a useful tool, but it is not without drawbacks. Renowned investment researcher Michael Mauboussin has suggested that a high ROCE can indicate that ‘one dollar invested in the company generates value of more than one dollar’.

How Do You Calculate Return On Capital Employed?

Analysts use this formula to calculate return on capital employed:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets – Current Liabilities)

Or for PWR Holdings:

0.33 = AU$16m ÷ (AU$54m – AU$6.6m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2018.)

So, PWR Holdings has an ROCE of 33%.

See our latest analysis for PWR Holdings

Is PWR Holdings’s ROCE Good?

When making comparisons between similar businesses, investors may find ROCE useful. Using our data, we find that PWR Holdings’s ROCE is meaningfully better than the 15% average in the Auto Components industry. We would consider this a positive, as it suggests it is using capital more effectively than other similar companies. Setting aside the comparison to its industry for a moment, PWR Holdings’s ROCE in absolute terms currently looks quite high.

ASX:PWH Past Revenue and Net Income, April 25th 2019
ASX:PWH Past Revenue and Net Income, April 25th 2019

It is important to remember that ROCE shows past performance, and is not necessarily predictive. Companies in cyclical industries can be difficult to understand using ROCE, as returns typically look high during boom times, and low during busts. This is because ROCE only looks at one year, instead of considering returns across a whole cycle. Since the future is so important for investors, you should check out our free report on analyst forecasts for PWR Holdings.

How PWR Holdings’s Current Liabilities Impact Its ROCE

Current liabilities are short term bills and invoices that need to be paid in 12 months or less. Due to the way the ROCE equation works, having large bills due in the near term can make it look as though a company has less capital employed, and thus a higher ROCE than usual. To check the impact of this, we calculate if a company has high current liabilities relative to its total assets.

PWR Holdings has total assets of AU$54m and current liabilities of AU$6.6m. Therefore its current liabilities are equivalent to approximately 12% of its total assets. A minimal amount of current liabilities limits the impact on ROCE.

Our Take On PWR Holdings’s ROCE

With low current liabilities and a high ROCE, PWR Holdings could be worthy of further investigation. PWR Holdings shapes up well under this analysis, but it is far from the only business delivering excellent numbers . You might also want to check this free collection of companies delivering excellent earnings growth.

For those who like to find winning investments this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.