With A 4.5% Return On Equity, Is Mylan NV (NASDAQ:MYL) A Quality Stock?

    Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). By way of learning-by-doing, we'll look at ROE to gain a better understanding Mylan NV (NASDAQ:MYL).

    Mylan has a ROE of 4.5%, based on the last twelve months. That means that for every $1 worth of shareholders' equity, it generated $0.045 in profit.

    Check out our latest analysis for Mylan

    Advertisement

    How Do I Calculate Return On Equity?

    The formula for return on equity is:

    Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders' Equity

    Or for Mylan:

    4.5% = 545.6 ÷ US$12b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2018.)

    Most readers would understand what net profit is, but it’s worth explaining the concept of shareholders’ equity. It is the capital paid in by shareholders, plus any retained earnings. Shareholders' equity can be calculated by subtracting the total liabilities of the company from the total assets of the company.

    What Does Return On Equity Mean?

    ROE measures a company's profitability against the profit it retains, and any outside investments. The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. That means that the higher the ROE, the more profitable the company is. So, as a general rule, a high ROE is a good thing. That means it can be interesting to compare the ROE of different companies.

    Does Mylan Have A Good ROE?

    Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. As shown in the graphic below, Mylan has a lower ROE than the average (11%) in the pharmaceuticals industry classification.

    NasdaqGS:MYL Last Perf December 6th 18
    NasdaqGS:MYL Last Perf December 6th 18

    That certainly isn't ideal. It is better when the ROE is above industry average, but a low one doesn't necessarily mean the business is overpriced. Nonetheless, it might be wise to check if insiders have been selling.

    The Importance Of Debt To Return On Equity

    Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.

    Combining Mylan's Debt And Its 4.5% Return On Equity

    It's worth noting the significant use of debt by Mylan, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 1.20. Its ROE is quite low, even with the use of significant debt; that's not a good result, in my opinion. Debt increases risk and reduces options for the company in the future, so you generally want to see some good returns from using it.

    But It's Just One Metric

    Return on equity is one way we can compare the business quality of different companies. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.

    Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So you might want to check this FREE visualization of analyst forecasts for the company.

    Of course Mylan may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have high ROE and low debt.

    To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

    The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.

    Simply Wall St analyst Simply Wall St and Simply Wall St have no position in any of the companies mentioned. This article is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

    MI
    mitchell_lawler
    mitchell_lawler

    A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

    A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it. cover
    169
    ZO
    zoe_vi5fn

    Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.

    CO
    connor_iwn1g

    Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.

    Andrew Legget

    Great earnings season, but are the earnings real?

    Great earnings season, but are the earnings real? cover
    At first glance, this was the strongest earnings season in years. But when you look at where the growth actually came from, the story splits into two very different pictures.
    10
    Advertisement

    Weekly Picks

    LO
    Lou_Basenese
    ONCY logo
    Lou_Basenese on Oncolytics Biotech ·

    The Team Behind a $2 Billion Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Deal Just Took Over This $105 Million Cancer Biotech

    Fair Value:US$3.575.5% undervalued
    31 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative
    TR
    tripledub
    Recommended Voice
    META logo
    tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

    The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

    Fair Value:US$5861.4% undervalued
    62 users have followed this narrative
    3 users have commented on this narrative
    34 users have liked this narrative
    TA
    Talos
    Emerging Author
    VOYG logo
    Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

    The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

    Fair Value:US$385.291.1% undervalued
    65 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    6 users have liked this narrative
    IV
    Emerging Author
    UBER logo
    Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

    Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

    Fair Value:US$11632.1% undervalued
    13 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    3 users have liked this narrative

    Updated Narratives

    RO
    Robbo
    ULVR logo
    Robbo on Unilever ·

    Unilever (LSE:ULVR), changes in the wind.

    Fair Value:UK£42.2813.0% overvalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    TR
    tripledub
    DSK logo
    tripledub on Dusk Group ·

    Buying a Dollar for Fifty Cents: The Case for Dusk Group

    Fair Value:AU$0.790.6% undervalued
    24 users have followed this narrative
    3 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    TR
    tripledub
    TSM logo
    tripledub on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing ·

    The Most Wonderful Monopoly in the Most Dangerous Neighbourhood on Earth

    Fair Value:US$378.2910.4% overvalued
    84 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative

    Popular Narratives

    OS
    oscargarcia
    NVDA logo
    oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

    The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

    Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
    363 users have followed this narrative
    9 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative
    CU
    MSFT logo
    CubanEros on Microsoft ·

    A wonderful business at reasonable price.

    Fair Value:US$419.9122.3% overvalued
    212 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    9 users have liked this narrative
    JO
    John_Eric
    Emerging Author
    MELI logo
    John_Eric on MercadoLibre ·

    MercadoLibre and the Spreadsheet Trick That Decides Everything

    Fair Value:US$7.31k73.1% undervalued
    125 users have followed this narrative
    3 users have commented on this narrative
    17 users have liked this narrative

    Trending Discussion