Why REM Group (Holdings) Limited’s (HKG:1750) Return On Capital Employed Is Impressive

Today we are going to look at REM Group (Holdings) Limited (HKG:1750) to see whether it might be an attractive investment prospect. In particular, we'll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), as that can give us insight into how profitably the company is able to employ capital in its business.

First up, we'll look at what ROCE is and how we calculate it. Second, we'll look at its ROCE compared to similar companies. Finally, we'll look at how its current liabilities affect its ROCE.

Advertisement

What is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. In general, businesses with a higher ROCE are usually better quality. Ultimately, it is a useful but imperfect metric. Author Edwin Whiting says to be careful when comparing the ROCE of different businesses, since 'No two businesses are exactly alike.

How Do You Calculate Return On Capital Employed?

The formula for calculating the return on capital employed is:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

Or for REM Group (Holdings):

0.13 = HK$26m ÷ (HK$269m - HK$65m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2019.)

So, REM Group (Holdings) has an ROCE of 13%.

Check out our latest analysis for REM Group (Holdings)

Is REM Group (Holdings)'s ROCE Good?

One way to assess ROCE is to compare similar companies. REM Group (Holdings)'s ROCE appears to be substantially greater than the 8.1% average in the Electrical industry. We would consider this a positive, as it suggests it is using capital more effectively than other similar companies. Separate from REM Group (Holdings)'s performance relative to its industry, its ROCE in absolute terms looks satisfactory, and it may be worth researching in more depth.

REM Group (Holdings)'s current ROCE of 13% is lower than its ROCE in the past, which was 44%, 3 years ago. Therefore we wonder if the company is facing new headwinds. You can click on the image below to see (in greater detail) how REM Group (Holdings)'s past growth compares to other companies.

SEHK:1750 Past Revenue and Net Income, January 21st 2020
SEHK:1750 Past Revenue and Net Income, January 21st 2020

It is important to remember that ROCE shows past performance, and is not necessarily predictive. ROCE can be deceptive for cyclical businesses, as returns can look incredible in boom times, and terribly low in downturns. ROCE is only a point-in-time measure. If REM Group (Holdings) is cyclical, it could make sense to check out this free graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

How REM Group (Holdings)'s Current Liabilities Impact Its ROCE

Current liabilities include invoices, such as supplier payments, short-term debt, or a tax bill, that need to be paid within 12 months. The ROCE equation subtracts current liabilities from capital employed, so a company with a lot of current liabilities appears to have less capital employed, and a higher ROCE than otherwise. To counter this, investors can check if a company has high current liabilities relative to total assets.

REM Group (Holdings) has total liabilities of HK$65m and total assets of HK$269m. As a result, its current liabilities are equal to approximately 24% of its total assets. A fairly low level of current liabilities is not influencing the ROCE too much.

Our Take On REM Group (Holdings)'s ROCE

With that in mind, REM Group (Holdings)'s ROCE appears pretty good. REM Group (Holdings) shapes up well under this analysis, but it is far from the only business delivering excellent numbers . You might also want to check this free collection of companies delivering excellent earnings growth.

If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of growing companies that insiders are buying.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

About SEHK:1750

REM Group (Holdings)

An investment holding company, engages in the manufacture and sale of low-voltage electrical power distribution and control devices in Hong Kong, Macau, and the Mainland China.

Flawless balance sheet with solid track record.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

LO
Lou_Basenese
OPTH logo
Lou_Basenese on Optimi Health ·

The Only Psychedelic Company Already Selling MDMA and Psilocybin to Real Patients, Yet Priced Like It Doesn’t Exist

Fair Value:US$1158.7% undervalued
32 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative
WE
WealthAP
NOVO B logo
WealthAP on Novo Nordisk ·

Novo Nordisk (NVO): Is the "Easy Growth" Story Over?

Fair Value:DKK 407.7721.6% undervalued
48 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
5 users have liked this narrative
VA
ValueInvestingSubstack
ZTS logo
ValueInvestingSubstack on Zoetis ·

Zoetis down -50% over the past year

Fair Value:US$92.9220.2% undervalued
14 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
7 users have liked this narrative
CE
CentryResearch
LEU logo
CentryResearch on Centrus Energy ·

Centrus Energy: The Next Nuclear Bottleneck Isn't Reactors. It's Fuel.

Fair Value:US$1908.3% undervalued
11 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
6 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

AN
AnimalDoctorKwon
A176750 logo
AnimalDoctorKwon on DuChemBIOLtd ·

DuChemBio absorbs Radio DNS Labs as Novartis injects 140B KRW into Korean RLT. With 100%+ OCF/EBITDA, the 6-mo lag is a de-risked steal.

Fair Value:₩10k43.5% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
AL
NOW logo
Alice3D on ServiceNow ·

NOW is an established SAAS positioned for accelerated growth over the next 5 years.

Fair Value:US$15538.4% undervalued
23 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
EP
SVRS logo
Epstein_Research on Silver Storm Mining ·

Silver Storm Mining, oversold silver junior

Fair Value:CA$278.5% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

IN
Investingwilly
MA logo
Investingwilly on Mastercard ·

Mastercard: The Best Dividend Stock You're Ignoring

Fair Value:US$75029.1% undervalued
101 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
9 users have liked this narrative
BE
PYPL logo
benjamin_lvieq on PayPal Holdings ·

PayPal: PayPal Doesn't Need to Grow – It Needs to Stop Falling – A Mispriced Cash Machine With a Cannibal Buyback

Fair Value:US$6514.6% undervalued
69 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
10 users have liked this narrative
BL
BlackGoat
CBRS logo
BlackGoat on Cerebras Systems ·

The Wafer Giant Threatening NVIDIA's GPU Hegemony

Fair Value:US$415.5449.5% undervalued
64 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

ST
StoxEurope
AD logo
StoxEurope on Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize ·

I ran Ahold Delhaize through a three-model triangulation — DCF, dividend discount, and residual income — with every assumption published and tagged as fact or assumption. The interesting result isn't a number, it's a disagreement: the point estimates run from €20,03 (RIM) through €27,64 (DDM) to €64,91 (DCF), and the pairwise overlaps form two disjoint segments — €20,36–€21,54 and €39,60–€44,56. Between €21,54 and €39,60, no two of the three models agree. [img]https://staticm.fastcomments.com/1784197249786-1000x1000-ad-range-strip.png[/img] Most of the spread is lens properties rather than company drama. A dividend model structurally can't see the roughly half of shareholder returns Ahold pays through buybacks. The book is ~96 % goodwill from the 2016 merger, which pins the residual-income reading low. And ~83 % of the DCF's value sits beyond the explicit five years, so it leans hard on the terminal assumptions. Three honest lenses, three honest answers — the disagreement is the information. Disclosures Position disclosure: The author holds no position in Ahold Delhaize as at 9 July 2026. This valuation is a StoxEurope opinion, based on honest research. Mistakes are possible. This is not investment advice. Do your own research. This article demonstrates a valuation methodology. It is not an investment recommendation, is not personalised to any reader's circumstances, and every figure in it depends entirely on the stated assumptions

1
|
0