Is WPX Energy, Inc.'s (NYSE:WPX) 16% ROE Better Than Average?

    Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand WPX Energy, Inc. (NYSE:WPX).

    Over the last twelve months WPX Energy has recorded a ROE of 16%. One way to conceptualize this, is that for each $1 of shareholders' equity it has, the company made $0.16 in profit.

    View our latest analysis for WPX Energy

    Advertisement

    How Do I Calculate ROE?

    The formula for return on equity is:

    Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

    Or for WPX Energy:

    16% = US$732m ÷ US$4.6b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2019.)

    Most know that net profit is the total earnings after all expenses, but the concept of shareholders' equity is a little more complicated. It is all the money paid into the company from shareholders, plus any earnings retained. You can calculate shareholders' equity by subtracting the company's total liabilities from its total assets.

    What Does Return On Equity Signify?

    ROE measures a company's profitability against the profit it retains, and any outside investments. The 'return' is the yearly profit. The higher the ROE, the more profit the company is making. So, as a general rule, a high ROE is a good thing. Clearly, then, one can use ROE to compare different companies.

    Does WPX Energy Have A Good Return On Equity?

    Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. As is clear from the image below, WPX Energy has a better ROE than the average (12%) in the Oil and Gas industry.

    NYSE:WPX Past Revenue and Net Income, February 11th 2020
    NYSE:WPX Past Revenue and Net Income, February 11th 2020

    That's clearly a positive. In my book, a high ROE almost always warrants a closer look. One data point to check is if insiders have bought shares recently.

    The Importance Of Debt To Return On Equity

    Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.

    WPX Energy's Debt And Its 16% ROE

    While WPX Energy does have some debt, with debt to equity of just 0.47, we wouldn't say debt is excessive. Its very respectable ROE, combined with only modest debt, suggests the business is in good shape. Conservative use of debt to boost returns is usually a good move for shareholders, though it does leave the company more exposed to interest rate rises.

    But It's Just One Metric

    Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. All else being equal, a higher ROE is better.

    But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

    Of course WPX Energy may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have high ROE and low debt.

    If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

    We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

    MI
    mitchell_lawler
    mitchell_lawler

    A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it.

    A landmark settlement is meant to punish Meta (META). If the 1998 tobacco deal is any guide, it might protect it. cover
    88
    ZO
    zoe_vi5fn

    Any moat with an opt-out clause for your competitors is just a fence around your own garden.

    CO
    connor_iwn1g

    Worth looking at what previous legal action actually did to Meta rather than reaching for tobacco. The FTC's record five billion dollar privacy fine in 2019 was met with the stock rising, because it came in below fears and removed an open question. GDPR was designed to constrain large platforms and increased their share of the European ad market, because compliance cost fell hardest on small intermediaries. The FTC's antitrust case, the one that could genuinely have broken the company up, was decided in Meta's favour last November. The only thing that ever meaningfully hurt the business was Apple changing a tracking default, and Meta out-spent that too, while the ad-tech firms that could not afford to rebuild disappeared. The pattern is not that Meta survives regulation. It is that regulation keeps costing its smaller competitors more.

    Andrew Legget

    Great earnings season, but are the earnings real?

    Great earnings season, but are the earnings real? cover
    At first glance, this was the strongest earnings season in years. But when you look at where the growth actually came from, the story splits into two very different pictures.
    10
    Advertisement

    Weekly Picks

    LO
    Lou_Basenese
    ONCY logo
    Lou_Basenese on Oncolytics Biotech ·

    The Team Behind a $2 Billion Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Deal Just Took Over This $105 Million Cancer Biotech

    Fair Value:US$3.575.7% undervalued
    22 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    7 users have liked this narrative
    TR
    tripledub
    Recommended Voice
    META logo
    tripledub on Meta Platforms ·

    The $135 Billion Bet That Should Make Every Shareholder Nervous

    Fair Value:US$5862.5% undervalued
    59 users have followed this narrative
    3 users have commented on this narrative
    34 users have liked this narrative
    TA
    Talos
    Emerging Author
    VOYG logo
    Talos on Voyager Technologies ·

    The "Landlord of Orbit" – A Deep Value Play Ahead of the Starlab Era

    Fair Value:US$385.291.0% undervalued
    58 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    6 users have liked this narrative
    IV
    Emerging Author
    UBER logo
    Ivoed on Uber Technologies ·

    Uber’s Valuation Depends On Who Captures The Economics Of Driverless Rides

    Fair Value:US$11633.7% undervalued
    11 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    3 users have liked this narrative

    Updated Narratives

    AC
    INTC logo
    achillez_97613 on Intel ·

    Fair Value = $110, Bull = $150, Bear = $65.

    Fair Value:US$56.0564.3% overvalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    RE
    AGFB logo
    RecMag on Agfa-Gevaert ·

    Agfa-Gevaert is a digital and materials turnaround opportunity, with growth potential in ZIRFON, but carrying legacy risks.

    Fair Value:€5.3991.4% undervalued
    28 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    LU
    LunaRodas
    FRO logo
    LunaRodas on Frontline ·

    FRO | Frontline: What They Said vs. What They Did

    Fair Value:US$34.0728.4% overvalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative

    Popular Narratives

    OS
    oscargarcia
    NVDA logo
    oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

    The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

    Fair Value:US$28018.6% undervalued
    365 users have followed this narrative
    9 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative
    CU
    MSFT logo
    CubanEros on Microsoft ·

    A wonderful business at reasonable price.

    Fair Value:US$419.9120.3% overvalued
    213 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    9 users have liked this narrative
    KI
    AMZN logo
    KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

    Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

    Fair Value:US$475.0946.1% undervalued
    237 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    8 users have liked this narrative